English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If the coorperations get their North American Union, they will eventually assimilate canadians and Mexicans through trade and commerce. Eventually over generations North America could become the United States of North America. Will this be good or bad for American citizens?

2007-01-23 12:08:24 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

9 answers

I have no problem with it ...it may make our currency more, like the euro did in Europe

2007-01-23 12:16:28 · answer #1 · answered by undercovernudist 6 · 1 5

Americans can kiss their freedom good bye once it happens.

Anyways, I don't think the North American Union is possible. The reason I don't think it is possible is because the United States is already a union, hence united. If the North American Union is forced into creation against the populace's will, then states could potentially break away from the U.S..

If the North American Union's creation caused the states to break away from the U.S., would this be the real purpose behind the North American Union plan? Is it possible that foreign influences are trying to divide and conquer America by manipulating and bribing politicians?

The only way I can forsee the states not breaking away is if each state had to vote on the creation of the North American Union. If the states had to vote on the creation of the North American Union, then the North American Union would never be created.

Something is seriously fishy about the North American Union plan.

2007-01-23 12:25:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

there'll be no safe practices or prosperity for us.no longer strong for all of us yet Mexico and China. Our usa receives decrease down the middle and borders are erased. Hand picked human beings make the regulations instead of elected officials. Rapist, murderers and theives will be no longer conceivable to capture.China owns various the ports in Mexico and US. they ought to not ought to pay import expenses, so as that they are going to make even extra money sending their crap right here. modification 413 in defeated amnesty bill gave Bush the authority to procede with the SPP, you probably did not really imagine it become very almost unlawful extraterrestrial beings? Why do you imagine Calderon become so mad!

2016-12-02 23:22:09 · answer #3 · answered by minogue 4 · 0 0

All 3 countrys in one is a very bad idea, no way can this work. This brain storm to make Mexico, canada, and the U. S. A., would only be good for big business. A world with open borders also is a very bad idea. Both of these must be stopped.

2007-01-23 12:16:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

North American Union to Replace USA by 2010

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.

The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:

The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.

2007-01-23 12:15:00 · answer #5 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 2 1

I think we need to close our borders. This new North American Union scares me in a big way. We our giving up our identity and everything that made this counrty great onces....

2007-01-23 12:14:43 · answer #6 · answered by twoskinsoneman 2 · 2 1

We really have no idea how it will affect all citizens, I suppose the rich will get richer and the working people will be screwed.

2007-01-23 12:53:26 · answer #7 · answered by Carol R 7 · 3 0

yes

2007-01-23 12:11:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

yes. bad.

2007-01-23 12:16:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers