Should Bush be impeached for derelect of duty? He avoids every opportunity to protect our border. Because of that, he is responsible for loosing the war on drugs and he's also responsible for violence caused by Illegals.
2007-01-23 12:01:25 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
I think protecting us from terrorism is a wee bit more important than the border at the moment.
2007-01-23 12:04:03 · answer #1 · answered by Appono Astos 5 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Our border was not "protected" sufficiently long before Bush or even Clinton was president. As a matter of fact, it has been insufficiently protected since before many posting on here were even born. If we ever have a properly protected border in the future remains to be seen. Amnesty has been given to illegal aliens before (again, before Bush was president). There were no "impeachment proceedings" for amnesty being granted before. I do agree that amnesty will not solve our problems, and our border MUST be protected properly. I just want people on here to realize that this has been an ongoing problem that has been allowed to go unchecked for decades and don't blame it on any one president or any one generation of Americans. I do agree that a lot of politicians look the other way and want to leave the problem to be "solved" by another generation of politicians because they don't want to lose votes, or perhaps even are benefiting monetarily from some of this. It is up to patriotic American citizens to scream loudly enough and INSIST that our leaders protect our country as we trusted them to do when we elected them!!!!
2007-01-23 12:41:59 · answer #2 · answered by none 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you're misreading this.. truly undesirable. Amnesty has to do with legalizing unlawful extraterrestrial beings. Buchanan is disenchanted because of the fact the unlawful Immigrants are not being deported because of the fact the regulation specifies, the acceptable opposite which you are trying to take this as. Buchanan isn't for anmesty, and immigration and amnesty are no longer one interior the comparable. Republicans are those combating against the legalizaling unlawful extraterrestrial beings. Democrats want legalization (Amnesty). we've those "Sanctuary cities" that are obstructing natianal regulation and refusing to deport those illegals, making it much greater solid for the federal government to do away with them.
2016-11-26 22:06:34 · answer #3 · answered by wintle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush's stand on immigration and illeagal amnesty has driven me quite literally from a Bush supporter to a Bush hater. He has disapointed everyone! The conservatives hate em. The liberals hate em'. I think Hillary paid him off to turn republicans against their own party..
2007-01-23 12:12:37 · answer #4 · answered by twoskinsoneman 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
He's also responsible for the "certified act of terrorism" in the form of illegal immigration protests in May of 2006. Good job by the way with CNN. All bought and paid for. Good job. Not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Too the person with no name: agreed. But you seem to forget one thing, they were here illegally to begin with thus they're foreigners, then to protest telling us to give them citizenship and/or amnesty? NEWSFLASH that was a FORCE OF AUTHORITY to INFLUENCE the policy or affect the conduct of the United States Government and COERCE the civilian population. The GAME IS UP!!!!!!! WE THE PEOPLE ARE FED UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not only that, but here look at the terrorist ringleader and their financial backers knowingly financially supporting it for petes sake!!!!
http://www.manews.org/1006razamoney.html
Whats it going to take, them walking up to you personally and pulling the trigger? Don't think they won't
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HL0QdHtVtkA&mode=related&search=
It was IN FACT a "Certified act of Terrorism" ladies and gentlemen.
The answer to your question is YES!!!!!!!!!!
2007-01-23 12:29:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Are you another one of those liberal swine who feels the need to attack the republicans for Clinton's impeachmet?
Clinton was impeached for lying before Congress! He was not only impeached, he was disbarred, too.
This man is completely shameless! He will now come around to embarrass the country some more, by campaigning for Hillary. I really hope it comes back to bite them both, right in the @ss!
2007-01-23 12:09:04 · answer #6 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
"I think protecting us from terrorism is a wee bit more important than the border at the moment."
Hahaha, you people are so brainwashed. The borders and ports are how terrorists get into the country.
2007-01-23 12:07:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
He should be impeached for MANY reasons.
2007-01-23 12:54:01 · answer #8 · answered by Carol R 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ive always wondered why americans elect, and re elect a leader that does nothing to protect its borders, why is that
2007-01-23 12:04:41 · answer #9 · answered by lat0ria 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
yes
2007-01-23 23:50:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋