I have wondered if women really are interested in someone for themselves or if money plays a major role. I don't have any experiences to base this off of.
2007-01-23 11:48:01 · 10 answers · asked by mebarsky 3 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
I'm 30 (almost 31) and money doesn't mean anything to me. One of my good friends I met in my early 20's told me that you need to find someone you can have a good conversation with because this will come in handy when the looks are gone and you're sitting on your front porch in your rockers.
2007-01-23 11:54:06 · answer #1 · answered by Misty Eyes 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I think it depends on the woman. I have been with guys strictly for who they were, not caring that some were always broke. I have never been with someone BECAUSE he had money. However, I will say that now that I am 29, I would not date someone who is always broke. If I as a single mother can manage to work and always be able to pay for myself, then I see no reason why anyone (barring disability or a situation beyond one's control) cannot do the same.
2007-01-23 19:52:52 · answer #2 · answered by bcs_boadicea 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have to say it does make a difference but not the kind your thinking of. I don't want to be someone who is in the late 30's and hasn't saved a cent. I want someone who knows how to save money. I know I would then have a secured future. I want someone who will spend there money wisely like me. I married someone who couldn't save and it put me in the hole. I can't do that again. I have finally learned how to budget and save. So this is when someone has money it does say more than $$$$ it says they are responsible.
2007-01-23 20:01:06 · answer #3 · answered by browneyegirl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
almost 28...does that count? Anyway, as long as the guy isn't a lazy slug, then I don't care how much money he makes. At the end of the day, money doesn't keep people warm, ya know? As long as the guy is there for me and takes care of his family, then i'm happy. If he's doing his best then I can't ask for more (it's cliche, but it's true).
2007-01-23 19:54:25 · answer #4 · answered by princess4444 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Okay I am 27, but mature. Money makes no difference to me personally. If you truly love someone then its for what they are not what they have. But there are also alot of high maintenance women out there.
2007-01-23 19:56:31 · answer #5 · answered by LAC_27 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry to say but most women want money and more money. Few like a guy (sincerely) for themselves, charm, humor, fun... Money is nice but I prefer a great sense of humor,someone that is thoughtful, honest, faithful.
2007-01-23 19:52:41 · answer #6 · answered by nanny4hap 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It all depends on the person or should I say the woman. I wouldn't want to be with a dirt poor guy. But I wouldn't be with a rich guy just for his money. As long as your trying to support yourself that is what counts. I'm not into a guys bank account because I don't want you into mine.
2007-01-23 19:56:12 · answer #7 · answered by GoldenGirl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am 32 years old. I do not go out with guys for there money. I am living with my bf now, money is important to pay the bills that's all. He would make me happy rich or broke.
2007-01-23 19:52:02 · answer #8 · answered by Deborah 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am in that age bracket, and if the man was very nice and I was physically attracted to him, being rich wouldn't be the most important thing, BUT he has to be hard working, have ambition in his life to want to do well for himself, and not be a bum. I don't need a mansion but I need to at least be without extreme financial worries.
2007-01-23 19:55:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would depend on the Lady and her motives. I always swore I'd marry a rich guy but feel in love with my poor guy :) But we are happy
2007-01-23 19:52:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋