2007-01-23 11:14:36 · 6 answers · asked by thepaxilman 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I think the real point of this question is to see how many stupid christians will fall for this straw man argument.
I count one already.
2007-01-23 11:28:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Buddha teaches about love too. You didn't even read about what Buddha teaches and you just throw out this kind of question. What are you trying to do? Even if you've read it, it just means that you don't understand his teaching at all.
2007-01-23 20:10:58 · answer #2 · answered by Renee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You asked this yesterday, I replied, you're taking things out of context and just repeatedly posting the same trash. For the record, since you're teaching me patience... you're taking the nihilistic view of "emptiness" and it's incorrect view so it doesn't work as a logical argument. When you study Buddhism correctly and understand the terminology and debate, then I invite you to try to refute the Buddha's teachings, until then... I'm not impressed.
_()_
2007-01-23 19:22:52 · answer #3 · answered by vinslave 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Last time I checked, Buddha is love too!
2007-01-23 19:18:19 · answer #4 · answered by a sock 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I CHOOSE LOVE = JESUS !
Surprises me just how many choose nothingness. They really don't know what they are missing out on.
If ever they just once felt the presence of Jesus they could never again settle for nothing else. As a matter of fact they would crave more & more just as true Christians do after they have been touched by the Holy Spirit.
Great question, thanks.
God Bless & keep the Faith..
2007-01-23 19:24:23 · answer #5 · answered by Bridget 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
No I don't, both taught love. Only difference is that one didn't teach eternal hellfire, judgement and damnation.
2007-01-23 19:21:11 · answer #6 · answered by Om 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋