Do Evolutionists believe in the Big Bang?

Question

Do they believe that there was some separation of matter that made everything how it was? What made that matter... was it the scientists who Created it, before science could even exist?

Answer 1

Some do but must of them don't.

Answer 2

a) Evolution had nothing to do with the big bang.
b) Big bang is a very well supported scientific theory:
i)Cosmological redshift
ii)Hubble's Law
iii)Cosmic microwave background radiation
c) It is supported by general relativity (Stephen hawking and Roger Penrose found the solutions to Einstein's equations which predict the big bang
d) No one knows exactly where the matter came from, this is not the idea of the theory, for this question to be answered a quantum theory of gravity is required, however the current theory is that using the mass energy equivalence (E=mc^2) and the fact that potential energy is negative, the total energy constant of the universe is probably 0, and the universe could have formed either from quantum vacuum fluctuations in higher dimensional space, or a collision between two 11dimensional p-branes.

Answer 3

Maybe if I put the words on separate lines, Christians will finally get it....

Evolution
is
not
the
same
as
universal
origin.

Evolution has been pretty much proven (except that Christians refuse to accept it. At least in the United States. Everywhere else doesn't have a problem with it).

The origin of the universe has several theories, none of which are proven and current technology level prevents proper testing of any said theories on the origin of the universe.

However, I think it is one of the posibilities. Much more likely than an omnipotent omnicient god that pretty much ignores everything unless you've done something that god doesn't like in which case he takes great joy in sending you to burn in hell for all eternity.

The Big Bang makes more sense.

Answer 4

Current understanding is that matter was created out of energy (E=MC squared - tell Hiroshima that's only a theory). Energy expanded from a singularity. As to what made the singularity, there are a number of theories (e.g. false vacuum, brane collision) but we don't have the technology to probe that yet. More energetic colliders and more powerful telescopes may get us closer to the answer. We haven't given up looking - unlike I.D.iots.

Answer 5

Science is about explaining the universe in the terms of knowable, repeatable data. We cannot know what happened before the Big Bang because all the data that is knowable comes from after that point in time. Any assumption about what happened before that time is as fictitious as any other unless someone figures out a way to use our verifiable data to look past that point.

Answer 6

1) Evolution has nothing to do with the big bang.
2) Evolutionist is not a word.
3) No, no seperation of matter.
4) Please look up the big bang theory to see what it actually means. I recommend Carroll & Osley, Steve Wineberg, and Hawking's work.

Answer 7

I believe that the Big bang is a viable theory... Which is more improbable? A perfect being that spontaneously comes into existence only to create us kill us all in a flood and then recreate us,... Or a singularity that creates a universe of disarray which over billions of years we come to existence.

Answer 8

Most real science confirms the Bible. See here: http://everystudent.com/forum/science.ht...
More resources: Creation Resource Foundation: www.creationresource.org

Great scientists like Johannes KEPLER saw God's magnificance and constantly gave praise to God Almighty for his wonderful laws built into nature. He was a creationist.

So was Isaac NEWTON.......and he wrote 1 million words about his LITERAL belief in the Scripture. He was a creationist.
" I have a fundamental belief in the Word of God....I study the Bible daily". - Isaac Newton

The electromagnetic equations of James Clerk Maxwell attest to the Magnificant mathematical inginuity of the Creator.
He was a Creationist.

Answer 9

science doesnt create or prove....
science simply explains or makes the best guess possible with the existing facts-knowledge and a lot of guts.ppl lost their head because they believed that earth moves around the sun back on the 15th century.and that was only a theory .....

also its easier for me to believe that something like matter (+) and antimatter (-) came from nothing (+)+(-)=0 than god

Answer 10

there is a magnetic affect , call it thought being god ,that sets up the rule for electron photons to orbit the nucleus ,etc ,but ,in a pre-determinate way as determined by its quantitys and levels of orbit ,and its being seen.
the matter is created as the the contradiction of oppisites ,just as quantum physics has now ,found ; observing a thing changes that observed
and the non measurability ,even disappearance of observed phernomina ,thus so is it that forms the big bang

it needed but one [god] to see the darkness and see it as 'bad' for the light of the first day to be its balance [good] revealed oppisite [truth]

creationist ,not creationists is the root to scientuific observation forming all the basics of the scientrists ,the word was as witness of gods science inter acting as seen /revealed in the light.

god being eternal and infinite of cause cannot thus ever be seen as quantum science wouldst seem to confirm as it confirms the rule of observatiob being revealed in simply seeing even a particle.

Answer 11

Why couldn't matter have spontanoeusly assembled out of primordial particles that came into being immediately after the Big Bang? Nobody "makes" a thunderstorm. It just happens. Sometimes... s.h.i.t just happens.