Does the cost of legalized casino gambling in the United States outweigh the benefits?

Question

Please give me detailed information based on facts not biased arguments that concern this question. If you have extra information or ideas that will help me in my rebuttals for my upcoming tournament that would be great thank-you!

Answer 1

In my opinion, legalized gambling is controlled so that the house wins. Period. That being said, only the operators are the ones who can benefit. Like lotteries, it is a tax on people who are bad at math. This can also be addictive, and is usually practiced by people who are looking for an easy win and an improved life without working, as opposed to some fun entertainment.

The negative sides have been documented. The benefits also have been documented. But, the real problem is that the lie it is based (like some multilevel companies who sell the dream above the product) is so enticing to those who should stay away from it most. People who have less money, need to work harder, and need a quick gain are the most hurt. People who have extra money won't limit themselves after a short start since it is too addicting even for a short term stint - like a bag of Lays potato chips.

Sorry I don't have documents, facts or figures and I know they are out there, but I hope this helps.

Answer 2

Gambling is a form of entertainment and a excellent way for States to generate revenue. It has been shown that areas that have casinos do not have more crimes then areas that don't. Too many people us religion in their fight against gambling. To block casinos is censorship and infringement on personal freedom. Next these religious zealot will be burning books, oops they do that already.

Answer 3

No. Any form of addiction always leads to destruction of the victim's life and family, thus imposing strain on the US government taxpayers exponentially. This is true for gambling, drugs, alcohol, etc...