where are the half man half ape fossils?

Question

there should be millions of the so called missing link fossils, the one or two that have been found were created by men and have found nothing new, there are people with genetic problems and midgets and such that show that happens even now. it is not true the evidence is not there, if man evolved apes would not even still be around and there would even be half man half apes today, its foolishness to not see evolution is a myth except on a small scale to where an species has to adapt to its surroundings.

Answer 1

There are over 300 Australopithecus afarensis (2.7 - 4 million years old) alone. All your assertions are just propegations of lies.

Answer 2

Never mind the fossils we're a half man half ape species-we are still classified as anthropoid apes. Our forward facing pelvis is a characteristic of four legged primates not bipeds as is our coccyx and our inability to synthesise vitamin c is shared by every other primate . Evolution is an indisputable fact-deal with it.

Answer 3

This topic intrigues me.. So i will throw my concepts on the problem in. you've were given an exceedingly good question, and that i'm inspired. i myself am an atheist, although I do delight in logical questions which include yours. provides me something to imagine about. at the same time as i'm able to't locate an answer on your question, i'm able to grant this: they have got here across snakes with the skeletal continues to be of legs. What makes it so particular, although, is that it ought to both artwork for AND adversarial to proving evolution. in accordance to a christian pal of mine, the snake from the backyard of Eden lost its legs at the same time as it tempted Eve with the forbidden fruit, as punishment. perhaps the fossils hint that it is real? on the different hand, it would lean more suitable in the route of evolution. perhaps some type of historic 'snake' lost its legs in the course of the evolution procedure? there is also that catfish that must be got here across out of water.. i myself DO ask your self about the.. legitimacy of evolution often times. such rather some hoaxes were created.. such rather some fossils were misidentified. on the different hand.. at the same time as the international flooded and Noah made his Ark.. How did Noah convey mutually 2 of each animal? it would take rather awhile to get that many creatures.. and some lived so distant, i do not imagine it is conceivable that he amassed all of them so quickly. It purely doesn't look logical. My element is that interior the starting up it type of feels unreasonable that each and each animal that exists now will be got here across. i imagine that new creatures HAVE looked, or advanced because then. I do accept as true with what Shadow suggested, although. even if if some type of "evidence" become given, creationists would argue it. it really is no longer inevitably a foul element although, because it is nice to have self belief.. and that i assume that maximum evolutionists would proceed to argue their section even with any evidence adversarial to THEM. truly, we are no longer THAT distinct. each and each section purely want to instruct something which could likely under no circumstances be replied 100%.

Answer 4

They are still around. In fact, one of them just asked a question. Do a search for "where are the half man half ape fossils?"

Answer 5

Please go to your local library and read what Evolution is before you criticize it. There is a long list of transitional fossils proving evolution.

Try this on for size:

Ardipithecus > Australopithecus > Homo rudolfensis > Homo habilis > Homo erectus

The so called "missing link" is silliness, there is no missing link.

Answer 6

probably buried deep somewhere. Where is the proof your mythical God created the earth, The bible is not an answer as it is just words written years and years ago with nothing else to back it up.