2007-01-23 06:32:48 · 15 answers · asked by Jennifer S 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
He can't! He is a fictional character!
Oh, and so is Matlock.
2007-01-23 06:41:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, but Frank Morrison, a British lawyer of the 1930s, investigated the circumstantial evidence surrounding the Gospels (archaeological & manuscriptual evidence), and decided that there was enough evidence to believe that the Gospels were historically accurate. He later worte a book about his conclusins called "Who Moved the Stone?"
2007-01-23 14:48:43 · answer #2 · answered by Randy G 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that would make Ben Matlock (alias Andy Griffith) about 2,000 years old.
Do you think he could have defended Jesus any better?
2007-01-23 14:38:35 · answer #3 · answered by vgordon_90 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
matlock has nothing on Jesus Christ. he would be investigating for years
2007-01-23 14:40:00 · answer #4 · answered by ♣DreamDancer♣ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Matlock was well past his prime when Jesus died.
2007-01-23 14:35:40 · answer #5 · answered by mullah robertson 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
That's a bit of a mocking question but there is a book that looks at proving the "Case for Christ". It's a great book! Look it up online.
2007-01-23 14:37:16 · answer #6 · answered by sheepinarowboat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why ask a fictional character to invstigate a real person?
2007-01-23 14:41:16 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Andy and Opie have gone to the fishing hole. Won't be back for hours.
2007-01-23 14:40:39 · answer #8 · answered by Huey from Ohio 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you serious? I believe that jesus was just a regular joe schmoe, but Matlock? a fictional character? you could've at least made this question accurately funny, instead of just dumbly funny. nice try though.
2007-01-23 14:36:12 · answer #9 · answered by rhiamon 3 · 0⤊ 5⤋
is he gowing to time travel back in time to try and get him of so that he douse not get nailed to the cross
2007-01-23 14:39:05 · answer #10 · answered by andrew w 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋