English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

as long as both are of age it dont matter

2007-01-23 05:56:13 · answer #1 · answered by young grown man 4 · 0 0

15

2007-01-23 05:21:52 · answer #2 · answered by Osunwole Adeoyin 5 · 0 0

about 7

2007-01-23 05:23:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As long as both individual involved are over the age of eighteen and not declared incompetent, I think age has nothing to do with relationships. Others in the families involved may not agree though.

For myself, I would not want to date someone so significantly older than any day now they would drop dead from age or illness.

2007-01-23 05:21:00 · answer #4 · answered by banananose_89117 7 · 0 0

well as you get older the differencs matters less like lets see a 13 year old and a 20 year old messed up but a 50 and 70 fine look at it this way if a guy is way older then you why cant he get some 1 his own age there must be a reason.

2007-01-23 05:20:45 · answer #5 · answered by bond1254 1 · 0 0

acceptable to whom? legal anyone over 18 can choose as they wish. My father in law is 15 years older that my mother in law. She was 19 and he was 34 when my husband was born. They been together over 30 years.

2007-01-23 05:21:29 · answer #6 · answered by Ella727 4 · 0 0

It relies upon on your interpretation of the note "appropriate," the nature of the relationship and the genders of those in touch. appropriate through regulation or through societal criteria? nationwide guidelines variety through united states of america and position the "age of consensual sex" between age 9 and 21, with maximum falling between 14 and 18. there would properly be criminal variances for gay sex, and distinct a lengthy time period defined for appropriate criminal boy/boy and woman/woman sex (if gay sex is even legally permissible in reported area). There is also statutes defined for the fashion of sex (vaginal, anal, and so on.). interior the united states, federal guidelines propose a minimum age of 18 yet enable this to be overruled through man or woman states, with maximum lowering it to 16 (for this reason "this 30 12 months previous adult adult males with 16 12 months previous ladies" isn't unlawful in a lot of states). there would properly be exceptions made for travellers and exclusions are frequently made for being pregnant. for instance, Arkansas would enable a guy of ANY age to marry a lady of ANY age if the girl is already pregnant. community criteria for socially "appropriate" age variations variety wildly and performance a good propensity in the route of dependence on the actually a lengthy time period of the human beings in touch. interior the united states, researchers calcuated 2 formulation depending on the levels of those polled, and positioned them to actual be linear equations: y1 = x/2 + 7 y2 = 2 * (x-7) One is the inverse of the different, and the older you're, the bigger your variety will change into. y1 contraptions the decrease age "decrease" and y2 contraptions the better age "decrease." for instance, when you're 2 a lengthy time period previous, y1 will be 20/2 + 7 (or 17) and y2 will be 2 * 20-7 (or 26). through those formulation, it will be seen "socially appropriate" so that you may have a relationship with someone between the a lengthy time period of 17 and 26. when you're 40 4, your "socially appropriate" age variety will be 29 to seventy 4. apparently, although, when you're 14, your age variety would purely be 14 to fourteen. it is no longer a appropriate device, yet more suitable a "rule of thumb."

2016-10-15 23:59:43 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

As long as both parties are "of age", then whatever works for you is acceptable.

2007-01-23 05:19:37 · answer #8 · answered by NAN G 6 · 0 0

id say from 17-25....or older if u like.....

2007-01-23 05:22:22 · answer #9 · answered by Antionette 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers