English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-23 03:27:36 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Cars & Transportation Safety

9 answers

depends on which statistic you want to consider.

More people die in auto crashes each year then in airplane crashes.

but

The mortality rate of an airplane crash is pretty close to 100% where as a car crash isn't always fatal.

and then again...

Some statistical hounds point out the number of deaths per mile of total travel by the industry as a good measure of airplane safety vs. auto safety.

and then again...

Those that favor auto travel point out that when your car dies you can pull over to the side of the road most of the time and get it repaired.

Bottom line here.... YOU need decide what makes YOU comfortable in terms of travel.

.

2007-01-23 03:38:55 · answer #1 · answered by ca_surveyor 7 · 0 0

Because there are such a large number of cars on the road, there are a very high number of fatalities and injuries resulting from car accidents. Given that planes don't very often have accidents, there is a relatively small number of people who are injured in planes when compared to cars. Just think of all of the people you know - more than likely several of them have been involved in car accidents, some may have even suffered injury. Now ask everyone you know if they or anyone they know has ever been injured in a plane accident. I'd be surprised if you find any that have. Air travel is much safer overall but when there is an accident there are usually multiple injuries and a greater chance that there will be fatalities.

2007-01-23 03:34:44 · answer #2 · answered by ; - } 5 · 0 0

Yes statistics say airplanes are safer but I still feel totally in control on the ground. On Earth you're in control with your own Vehicle and you know who's riding with you. When I fly I'm relying on many other people to be sure the plane is safe and there ar no people aboard who want to bring harm to any of the passengers.

2007-01-23 03:39:57 · answer #3 · answered by Country Boy 7 · 0 0

i imagine your way of wondering is logical yet perhaps a touch more suitable idea is so as. There are some issues about flying that are a definate. One is that if the airplane is airborne and has to land because of failure you more suitable than in all probability gained't proceed to exist. although shall we glance on the motives of deaths in automobiles. at the same time as your utilising an vehicle you've 1000's even 1000's of pounds of metallic and so on heading appropriate for you. even although you've administration of your motorcar this does no longer propose that you wont have a collision. Its no longer how good you force that retains you out of an twist of destiny. Its how good human beings force. One in 3 injuries concerning automobiles is a fatality and thirty % of injuries are human beings whose utilising become impaired because of alcohol or drugs. Now with cell phones, smoking, ingesting, youthful ones, street rage, monetary device, stupid human beings, there are a selection of issues which could make utilising a severe threat. in the experience that your in a airplane you definately have a lot less site visitors interior the air. no longer that there hasn't ever been a collision of planes yet shall we face it, it doesnt take position typically. enable me see if i'm able to make an analogy to larger understand. 2 adult adult males go away San Francisco one through automobile and one through airplane. the only on the airplane pays 298 money to holiday to massive apple with one 2 hour layover in Denver making his flight common about 9 and a nil.5 hours. the position because the guy who's utilising has to end and fill up each 2 hours and it takes him 4 and a nil.5 days to make the holiday. Do you imagine the guy interior the vehicle had more suitable opportunities to die than the only interior the airplane? I do. wish i ought to help sorry it become see you later.

2016-10-15 23:53:00 · answer #4 · answered by mccarty 4 · 0 0

Think about it. There is a lot more room up in the air for planes to manuever than there is on the road for a car. Research shows that there are more car accidents than plane crashes.

2007-01-23 04:30:10 · answer #5 · answered by Jerrie's Daddy 2 · 0 0

Absolutely it is air travel. Lot of people, agencies, technicians and departments take care to make it safe. Whereas, travel by car is always prone to be unsafe and you cannot expect what happens and where and how. All the best.

2007-01-23 03:34:33 · answer #6 · answered by sharma p 4 · 0 0

Statistically speaking you chances of surviving a plane ride is MUCH greater than a car, but totally opposite if you run out of fuel.....

2007-01-23 16:48:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

planes crash less than cars

2007-01-23 17:30:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

cuz you are not drivin it urself

2007-01-23 04:04:27 · answer #9 · answered by bua 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers