2007-01-23 03:19:54 · 17 answers · asked by Brotherhood 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Women always fell that they are victims still of sexist people. When in fact they are the only generation that had the most rights of all women..
We have to pay child support for a our child. But yet if the woman would like to get a abortion then we have no say about our child. This is just another example...
EVERYONE READ THIS!!!!
EDIT* I can't believe people can't understand the subject of this question. He is asking IF we had a draft why are not women drafted? He knows that we don't have draft at the moment.
2007-01-23 03:27:30 · answer #1 · answered by AlienJack J 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well it has a lot to do with the fact that 1) there is no draft, and 2) who is going to stay at home with the children?? And before anyone says it I will the children could stay with the grandparents, or other family members, well on that 1) not everyone has family that the children could stay with which then means that the children would go to the state. 2) some of the grandparents are just too damn old or have too many health problems. 3) Other family members have their own families to take care of. 4) It is hard enough on military children when one parent is deployed.
Take my family I have 5 sisters and 1 brother, 3 of my sisters and my brother have 2 kids, 1 of my sisters has 3 kids, and my other sister and I have 4 kids, that is a grand total of 19 children that would live with my parents the ages are 15, 13, 12, 8, 6, 6, 5, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1, 2 mo now my parents are also 60ish yo and not in perfect health having 19 children in their house for a long time would kill them. I know the children could go to their other grandparents but all but 3 of us are single parents. I wouldn't send my kids to my in laws his parents are 50ish and right now they have my husband's brother his wife and their 3 kids living with them. So if you can find some place for my children to go WITHOUT going into foster care then draft me but until you find that place I will not go anywhere without my children.
2007-01-23 06:03:36 · answer #2 · answered by My little girl is here!! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The answer to this question may be biological in nature. Generally, the number of women available for reproducing determines the ability of a given population to sustain itself. We can get by with fewer men at home than women, because a single male can impregnate many women. A woman can stay home and reproduce, keeping our population stable, and producing more soldiers for the future. May seem unfair to both sexes, but makes sense from a biological point of view not to force women to fight. However, we do give them the option to join up by choice, but still limit their combat roles, for better or worse.
2007-01-23 04:50:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The shape provides training and to know it totally a radical information of purpose is likewise necessary. Ron Paul is the only candidate that incredibly has a relentless balloting checklist because of the fact he looks to The shape each and every time he votes. there is countless information there. Our Founding Fathers instant us to be non-interventionist. Be a chum to all international locations, commerce with all international locations yet do no longer become in touch of their politics. sure, he became warning human beings 30 years in the past approximately issues that are happening now. He has a radical information of the economic device, overseas coverage and well being care. he's the suitable selection for u.s..
2016-12-16 15:29:48 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because apparently they can't even be held to the same standards as the male soldiers. When they can pass a PT test on the men's requirements, they can fight on the lines. Max women's PT requirements are the minimum for the men.
Voting and being president don't take the conditioning required to be a soldier.
2007-01-23 06:17:10 · answer #5 · answered by desiderio 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well let me see here there is no draft!!!! And there are plenty of women fighting right now! I went to school with a few of the wonderful women that have been in Iraq and let me tell you they did just as much as the men.
2007-01-23 03:27:21 · answer #6 · answered by jenpoesavon 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I personnaly feel that the qualifications to be president should be ammended to include that one must have been a member of the armed forces. If your going to be in charge of them, then it would be a good idea to know what it is to be one of them, and understand the limitations and what not. For that matter, the Armed Services comittee should have that stipulation as well. Have you listened to the the literally stupid questions that they ask to the military? After all the insane questions that Hillary has asked of our generals, I can not even see her in a position to command them. Just my .02 worth as a military member..
2007-01-23 04:42:53 · answer #7 · answered by Shawn M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have a better question. How come we can enlist a 17 year old into the military to go out and fight and use weapons to kill other himan beings but they cannot vote? Pick your brain? I was 17 and enlisted and had this problem. This is a big problem.
2007-01-23 03:48:54 · answer #8 · answered by Trinity 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Women are fighting the war as we speak and there is no draft.
I fought in Kuwait in the first Gulf War and I am offended that I fought for someone like you. Wake up and educate yourself.
2007-01-23 03:26:41 · answer #9 · answered by babygyrl_nyc 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
For the same reason that men are not drafted.
2007-01-23 03:27:06 · answer #10 · answered by MD 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋