China or Russia?
China is has developed a weapon to knock out our sattelites which would leave us pretty vulnerable and is preparing their military as we speak. Russia we all know the history there. How real will war be to you then?
2007-01-23 03:16:32 · 13 answers · asked by Enigma 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Russia's control of nuclear weapons is the weak link, and the terrorists have enough oil money to buy a few.
Our policy of staying in Saudi Arabia after the first gulf war is the cause of 9/11.
Ironically, Al-quada had offered to fight Saddam Hussein's Iraq if the Saudies would not let US troops on Saudia Arabia's sacred soil.
So we (the US) are fighting today people that would have fought in our stead years ago (irony).
What is not mentioned in the press is all the money the weapons makers make in the US. That is the real fuel that intentionally makes our policy promote enemies, so there is a market for the products.
China has no interest to harm us in addition we owe them alot of money since they have loaned the US money to run the Iraq war.
Bush's sending troops to Iraq has opened a pandora's box of trouble. It stands to engulf the entire region. We will end up geting nuked here or there in the US or abroad and that will be the excuse to have WWIII, when Jesus gets back he will harvest and much of the rest is for the oven.
2007-01-23 03:45:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wonder what Ice cold is thinking if he believes South Korea will attack the US. I think he needs to learn a little history and some politics before he makes any more responses. I do believe we will have a major break out of fighting in the streets of the US by all the terrorist and extremest. The more time we keep giving them the more time they have to set up their objectives to make a major strike. One much worse than 911.
2007-01-23 03:34:16 · answer #2 · answered by tbird 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A lot of people just think that they know exactly what kind of weapons the U.S. has. In reality the United States doesn't tell the world what their best and most destructive weapons are. Just think after the U.S. announced they had a Atomic bomb back in 1942, the rest of the world finally figured out how to make them. Now the U.S. just thinks if they don't announce what they have, nobody can make it. I would be afraid to go to war with the U.S. considering they arent afraid to do what needs to be done. And they don't take to well to threats!
2007-01-23 10:20:58 · answer #3 · answered by Chance 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i ask your self what Ice chilly is wondering if he believes South Korea will attack the U. S.. i imagine of he needs to income particularly heritage and some politics previously he makes any further responses. I do have self belief we would have an substantial damage out of scuffling with interior the streets of the U. S. by each of the terrorist and extremest. the previous regularly happening time we keep giving them the previous regularly happening time they could want to examine their aims to make an substantial strike. One a lot worse than 911.
2016-10-15 23:52:21 · answer #4 · answered by mccarty 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uhh choosing to attack america is never a good idea
1. we don't hesitate to attack back without thinking of consquences and really don't even need a reason cause we'll make up some phony reason like they are building weapons of mass destruction or something.
2. we are the self-appointed world police.. we can have nukes but no one else can.. after all I do believe we are the only country to ever drop a nuke. So weapon wise i think we are safe.
2007-01-23 03:27:12 · answer #5 · answered by Reflective Deception 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neither of your choices will attack us. They don't have to if we attack the Iranians will attack us using their army which is a million strong and with their cruise and ballistic missiles. the missiles would strike at all the oil refineries in the gulf. Can you say 50.00 dollars a gallon? Our army is to bogged down with insurgents to fight them and the Iranians at the same time. How do you get supplies to the front when insurgents are always blowing up your convoys because the soldiers that would guard them are at the front?
2007-01-23 03:29:08 · answer #6 · answered by brian L 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would not be in the best interest for either to attack the USA. Iran is like a bad neighbor to China, Russia really does not have enough interest in Iran to risk "ALL IN" for such a bunch of all out thugs!
2007-01-23 03:22:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, at least we have M.A.D.--Mutually Assured Destruction. If a missle is launched at American soil, the ****'s gonna hit the fan on a worldwide scale. We have missles aimed at many many countries, who in turn have missles aimed at us and our allies. If somebody grows the balls to actually try and nuke us, there will be no world left to mourn.
2007-01-23 03:20:47 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
So we succumb to Iran and the terrorists?Sorry,I don't buy it.We defend our country with the best of our ability,and we are not as weak as you think we are in the weapons area.We have a few aces up our sleeves most people don't know about.
2007-01-23 03:22:05 · answer #9 · answered by rosierotnass 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
EVERYBODY !!! because nobody want more, It´s enough, stop this stupid and sterile wars which exist only to make rich the richest. Expend that billions in education, public health, hospitals, etc., be smart
2007-01-23 13:33:35 · answer #10 · answered by South 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋