English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Yes, God sent them Pelosi to screw up the Democratic party and personally give the Repub's the elections back in 08.

2007-01-23 00:20:21 · answer #1 · answered by mark g 6 · 1 2

Yes, it is definitely possible. Conservative voices are still being heard by Fox and talk radio (Rush, Hannity, Boortz, Savage, etc.) Luckily, conservatives tend to vote more than liberals--that helps too. If Mrs. Clinton runs for the democratic party, many independents will vote more conservative. It will depend on who is running and where they stand on the issues.

It's sad how we keep losing our freedoms. If the "Fairness Doctrine" goes through, our free speech will be limited even further.
http://www.citizenlink.org/CLtopstories/A000003652.cfm
This will cause us to have governmental monitoring of talk radio and if a station allows someone to express a political view, the radio station would be required to have an opposing view expressed on that subject---even if ratings make it unprofitable. Privately owned radio stations would no longer be allowed to make the decision on the content of political views that it chooses to air. I guess they are thinking that we are too stupid to change the radio station if we don't want to hear what's on it........

2007-01-23 03:10:51 · answer #2 · answered by Witchy 7 · 0 0

Comes off as sort of kooky. His foreign places coverage is in reality isolationism. no longer too many on the two component like that concept. whether or no longer they're going to admit to it or no longer, the two libs and cons want governmental involvement in distinctive components (gay marriage or no longer, abortions, and so on. down the line of maximum social type subject concerns). Ron Paul's stance is that if the state's opt to elect, it is wonderful, although this is not the federal government's interest. Liberals i could think of could be susceptible to his view on the social subject concerns hence.

2016-11-01 01:56:58 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The media doesn't vote, people do.

Plus, the media being liberal is a myth anyway. Studies show the media mostly neutral on political issues.

2007-01-23 00:22:25 · answer #4 · answered by Tony C 3 · 3 2

Oh, dear. You've drunk the kool-aid.

Liberal media? WHAT liberal media?

You misunderstand liberalism. There is barely any "left" in the Left anymore.

The only real liberal media is on the internet.

2007-01-23 02:13:19 · answer #5 · answered by Praise Singer 6 · 1 1

*sigh*
Mainstream media is non-biased... or at least it should be.

Given Bush's approval ratings, I doubt that people are still going to want the "conservative Christian" for President. I know I don't.

2007-01-23 00:20:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Are you joking? Bush said God told him to invade Iraq.

Liberal media? America is in the grip of ignorant fundamentalists bullying their way in to government.

The US needs an atheist in the white house but its not going to happen because people are too ignorant to understand. Look at you, for example.

2007-01-23 00:26:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Ronald Regan did!

2007-01-23 00:20:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well, we will just have to wait and see.

Society is starting to change, and for the most part they are getting a little fed up with all this religion stuff leaking into the culture.

2007-01-23 00:21:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Oh, please. The mainstream media are so far to the right you can't see the center from there, and Christians are treated with kid gloves. Don't believe everything the media tells you.

2007-01-23 00:21:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers