Everyone is responsible. If we'd all just work together in the first place and wouldn't have all this world hunger, war, racism and yeah it's all our faults...if only we'd come to a conclusion or had started out better!
2007-01-23 11:56:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Their own people. The Iraqis..first they allowed a individual to grow to a level where noone else had the guts to say anything against him. Then they allowed outsiders to take over to 'teach him a lesson'. If a small country like Japan can become world superpower after the devastating nuclear attack..where there was nothing left out..Iraqis surely were in a better position to restore the situation. When it comes to rebuilding the country..one must keep aside atleast for sometime the orthodox interests. Now also looks like some outsiders only must take the initiative to rebuild the nation! They are busy fighting among themselves. They need a good leadership, which is out of blind religious belief..concentrate first on the fallen economy of the country.
2007-01-24 17:56:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Saheli 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Come on give me a break a layman can understand who is responsible for the terrible state in iraq the britishers and the american dog Geoge W Bush. and who else,
The britishers did the same thing what they did in india divide and rule the same policy they applied in iraq they have divided sunni and shia a such a manner that the war between them will go till decades.
2007-01-23 00:25:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by healer 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Luck of Iraqis is only responsible for the terrible state. They have the petroleum wells on which America (George W. Bush) eyed and had messed with the affairs there.
2007-01-23 00:10:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by A Rauf 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
We spend 10 billion a month on the war so it extremely is undesirable for the financial gadget sure , the reason at the back of the recession are here , the deregulation of the loan and financial agency sectors, - this helps predators to do what they did suck people into undesirable loans that they can't locate the money for, - the Bush's tax cuts for the somewhat wealthy- this coupled with the war creates debt so we borrow to pay for the war while without giving millionaires and billionaires tax breaks we'd be waiting to locate the money for a number of it, extreme oil expenses, - the oil companies are making record earnings so the argument that they are only passing down the greater desirable value according to barrel right down to the customer is incorrect and naive the are gouging and with this administration do no longer assume this to provide up till Jan 09
2016-12-16 11:22:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The people accountable for the social decline in Iraq are the citizens. The divide of Iraq has been influenced by all the powers in the west and our interest is not all bad. We took on an impossible task and have failed. The barbarism of the fighting factions is inhumane and to think I thought about Islam with honor. simply put stupid is as stupid does.
2007-01-23 07:24:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Pablo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
President Bush, the American people, and United Nations in that order. Bush used the September 11 attack as an excuse to start the agression against Sadam Hussein (even though supposedly Osama Ben Laddin was the one behind the Twin Towers attack--go figure!!!). Bush put his aggressive cowboy political agenda ahead of the interest and welfare of American soldiers and Iraqi population. The American people acquiesced in the beginning, probably hoping they could gain something (like cheaper gas prices at the pumps, maybe?). Americans applauded his "decisiveness" back then. Since Americans have noticed that the oil companies and their chief executives are the only ones benefitting from the war they are now ready to withdraw support and stab Bush in the back. And lastly, the United Nations was noticeably ineffective, doing nothing to avert the masacre and abuses perpetrated against Iraq and doing nothing to expose the criminal behavior of Bush and his private mafia for what it actually is--a war of aggression like the one in Viet-Nam. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand that it is not right for a 600 pound wrestler (the U.S.) to beat up on a 100 pound weakling (the Iraqi people) under ANY pretense whatsoever. And, oh, by the way, we REALLY need to work on our democracy at home before going to other countries to cram it down other people's throat. Democracy, as envisioned by the founding fathers, has not existed in the U.S. for several decades. Democracy has yielded to small, wealthy groups in the U.S. We are only paying lip service to the concept hoping that no one will notice. Democracy and justice are increasingly becoming the privilege of those Americans who can pay for it; if you don't believe that, just go to the ghettoes and slums of any U.S. city or town and see for yourself.
2007-01-23 00:21:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Eva 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Syria, Iran and every one who don't know what's the meaning of peace, while US Army isn't responsible, they trying to help Iraq and all good Iraqies, come on world we have to face the truth and stop lying on our selves and say that the USA is the reason.
2007-01-23 08:29:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sara 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
America
2007-01-23 17:24:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Prince 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
you cannot go and blame someone of our wish..
you cannot be sure that there is a terrible state in iraq
it's the people of the country who also opposed and the reason for the present situation of iraq....
there is no unity even between the people of same nation and religion...
2007-01-25 20:44:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dinesh . 1
·
0⤊
0⤋