Isn't that like trying to teach a goldfish to play chess?
2007-01-22 22:36:09 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
shall we see the assumption of evolution... single cells that have not have been given any intelligence lived interior the oceans. Then lots of them began to party and mentioned shall we co-exist. to be sure that this being to exist it is going to wish some blood. So those unintelligent residing organism come mutually and progressed blood. yet then they mentioned we will not exist without a coronary heart so shall we develop a coronary heart, and then a lung, (or is that a gill, because they have been residing in water) etc etc. that's never absurd. Unintelligent residing organism,information the complexities of a miles better residing being, and then forming one in each and every of those being. So what if there's a lacking hyperlink. which you would be able to assert we are "brainwashed" skill that there is one hundred% evidence there is not any longer god. Are you saying which you recognize each and every thing that there is to appreciate regarding the Universe? for the reason that's the only way you additionally could make one in each and every of those fact. What evidence do I truthfully have that god exists. I truthfully have witnessed small miracles, and that i understand others that have besides. that's all that i want. If i'm outstanding i'll circulate to heaven. If i'm incorrect i'm going to have led a satisfied, calm, religious existence. the two way i'm a winner. Now while you're incorrect...
2016-12-16 11:21:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem is, as with the religious views as well, best possible is stalemate.
You have no MISSING LINK to show us.
You have no VIDEOS of gene changes actually happening in humans, nor can you explain the process.
You can't explain the MECHANSIM by which one or two genes fuse or alter their characteristics. Not in ABSOLUTE TERMS.
You have NO LAWS.
You can't NEWTONIZE evolution.
There is no E=Mc2
This is not to say it won't happen eventually, but it has not happened. Not in HUMAN evolution.
THAT is why it is called a THEORY...
YOU have a theory and WE have a theory.
And as all people do with theories we cling to them and beleive in them and sulk when the otherside finds GAMMA RADIATION predicted 30 years before the discovery.
That's how Poor Steady State, the favorite of Dr. Hoyle, got eclpised by Big Bang (that name was coined by Hoyle as a joking reference), the theory made by a Catholic Priest, who predicted Gamma Rays in the background 30 - 40 years before radio telescopes and other devices detected it.
Now, EVOLUTION doesn't even have a CHAMPION on that end.
Apes to Humans was the postulate, but they NEVER found that MISSING LINK, so science is moving away from this concept and favoring a separate PURE HUMAN lineage. We came out of the sea as some "type" of animal, what, we're not sure of for they are extinct like the dinos but not big enough to make oil.
You have to find that missing link and show us GENETICALLY. You have to show us at least half of the 3-6 million genes differences between APES and HUMANS are in that LINK.
Go find your GENETIC footprint, them come back to the chess board, guppy!
2007-01-22 23:55:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Simply because Evolution cannot show how life started. Spontaneous Generation has failed every time it has been tried by science, yet you still say it is how all life started. If I find a dollar bill laying on the ground I believe someone made it, and someone else dropped it. I don't believe it just popped up there all by itself. Until you can PROVE evolution, I would not call people with a different belief theory stupid.
2007-01-22 23:05:10 · answer #3 · answered by mark g 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A lot of their explanations have a reasonable logic to them. So an intelligent person who doesn't understand how faulty those premises are could easily believe their conclusions.
It's a complicated enough issue that it takes some time and effort to get a decent grasp of it. Those of us who have can share that knowledge with others.
At least then they'll have a choice.
2007-01-22 22:48:26 · answer #4 · answered by The angels have the phone box. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Much the same reason that we keep trying to explain to you the truths of Creation.
But that's a bit like trying to teach a guppy nuclear physics
2007-01-22 22:53:35 · answer #5 · answered by kenny p 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
For some reason we keep thinking that they're intelligent enough to understand the issue, and will change their opinion. It's no our fault if there isn't a cure for stupid.
2007-01-22 22:49:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
For the same reason I try to explain economics to my dog; who is barely intelligent enough to remember not to piss on the floor.
2007-01-22 22:53:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
you guys keep changing this "theory"(thats all it is a theory get YOUR facts right.) whenever science disproves aspect of evolution. it was a theory and thats it. you though must need greater faith to believe what u do. u believe this. by chance this universe became a perfect working unity of planets. I mean why do we stay in orbit? and where did all these stars and planets come from? How did they all get there? cosmic gasses? well how did they get there?
so u have to have greater faith to believe evolution
u believe that NOTHING through NOTHING for NOTHING by NOTHING begat EVERYTHING
2007-01-22 22:51:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
For the same reason the religious right tries to teach others about the beauty of God and Jesus.
Everyone thinks his/her way of believing is the correct way.
2007-01-22 22:41:06 · answer #9 · answered by bikerchickjill 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I get this feeling like my brain is going to short-circuit if I don't correct their faulty logic.
2007-01-22 22:53:02 · answer #10 · answered by Lee Harvey Wallbanger 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋