2007-01-22 19:09:12 · 14 answers · asked by Samantha 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
its more of just kissing and body contact with clothes on. Like really, really close.
2007-01-22 19:21:42 · update #1
If both partners have their pants on, my guess is that pregnancy would be impossible. I did research on this topic years ago and never read about a case where it happened.
The possibility of becoming pregnant when one or both partners is just wearing underwear is unlikey but concievable.
PS--Be wearing at least some clothes if there is semen on the sheets/blankets. Its possible to become impregnated that way...
2007-01-22 20:14:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
this is possible in a few different ways but it is severely unlikely. The first would be the transfer of semen to the vagina. This can be moved by hands, clothing. usually sperm does not survive transfers unless they happen quickly.
Lady doctor specialists *for the life of me I forgot the name* can place a firtalized egg inside of a woman and that can bring about children. I have no idea why someone would do this without trying sex first but its a possibility.
Last would be immaculate conception. as far as I know there has only been one case of this and that case remains unconfirmed. A lady named mary gave birth to a wiz kid named jesus.
Hope that helped,
Silence
2007-01-23 03:15:59 · answer #2 · answered by Silent One 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. All it takes is ONE little swimmer to fertilize the egg, and it doesn't necessarily have to be intercourse that sets things in motion. Just a little sperm getting into the pool - whether by diving right in or dipping in the toes - can get the job done.
2007-01-23 03:14:12 · answer #3 · answered by zoni_tonya 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes this happened 2000 years ago in bethlehem
2007-01-23 03:13:40 · answer #4 · answered by Pauline 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ever heard of the Virgin Mary, mother of Jesus. Do you think you fit this description?
No you cannot unless of course your using a turkey baster.
2007-01-23 03:15:16 · answer #5 · answered by Jade74 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did the world get rid of Sex Ed????
2007-01-23 03:11:45 · answer #6 · answered by Princess 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Artifically, yes.
2007-01-23 03:13:18 · answer #7 · answered by natashainka 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ummm, a you-know-what or sperm had to be near your you-know-what. And I thought this was common sense.
2007-01-23 03:12:28 · answer #8 · answered by Olivia L 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I knew I should have stopped touching people!
2007-01-23 03:18:27 · answer #9 · answered by Louy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No there is no such thing of pregnant without intercourse.
2007-01-23 03:16:17 · answer #10 · answered by hafidz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋