be impeached for allowing the "Certified act of Terrorism" in the form of "illegal immigration protests" in May of 2006 without any action being taken to hinder or stop such attack?
2007-01-22 18:35:59 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
To speakeasy: I think he should. pretty interesting screenname by the way.;)
2007-01-22 18:50:05 · update #1
To Gianna M: Thank you for being awake. good reply
2007-01-22 20:05:56 · update #2
To Monreda: You get the the picture. It leaves no doubt does it?
2007-01-22 20:07:36 · update #3
To Sir Shaggy: They kill (on average)4000 US. citizens annually, thats more than the number of troops killed in Iraq(which need to come home by the way),and this figure doesn't include rapes, or injuries sustained due to conflict with them. How much more proof does one need?
http://www.numbersusa.com
2007-01-22 20:28:55 · update #4
The list is long i know, but the very thing we are supposedly fighting over in Iraq now doesn't measure up to what's taking place right here. We need to bring our troops home.
2007-01-22 20:33:05 · update #5
To samjet500: Image isn't everything dear, however a good name is.
2007-01-22 21:17:39 · update #6
The rights of people of this country, are for citizens with "Legal" status. Therefore you are right that he did allow the "Certified act of terrorism" to take place on U.S. soil when he allowed the protest to take place. Because if he really cared we should of had I.N.S. and Home Land Security all over those protesting sights. Instead he wants to make a plan to let them stay.
It seems like not until another part of a city blows up, and thousands of more U.S. Citizens die, will we see tighter borders. Could you imagine Bin Laden sympathizers protesting in our streets on his behalf?
2007-01-22 19:51:04 · answer #1 · answered by Gianna M 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He should be impeached for that and for many other reasons, such as ruining America's image (which makes lots of people deslike it) and the war on Iraq that had no satisfying results.
2007-01-23 05:09:34 · answer #2 · answered by Sam 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. However, failure to adequately defend the border is cause to take action against the President and many members of Congress as well as State and City officials.
Our nation is invaded. Time to clean house.
2007-01-23 02:44:01 · answer #3 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Bush said "war on terrorism"
yet he can't stop no one from entering this country to harm us
2007-01-23 04:21:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-01-23 08:25:39 · answer #5 · answered by Debra R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Impeached? No. Not for that.
2007-01-23 04:25:56 · answer #6 · answered by Dark 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes.
2007-01-23 03:11:38 · answer #7 · answered by monreda 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋