English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is where I am walking: the map is here:

http://www.yellowpages.ca/map/getdrivingdir.html?src=ypca&refPage=Merchant&fromSln=other&fromSt=1385+Woodroffe+Avenue&fromLm=&fromCi=Nepean&fromPv=ON&fromPc=K2G+1V8&selectedAddress=to&toSln=&toSt=1547+Merivale+Road&toLm=&toCi=Nepean&toPv=ON&toPc=K2G4V3&Get+Direction.x=41&Get+Direction.y=11

It says the distance in a car takes 7 minutes

2007-01-22 17:17:13 · 4 answers · asked by Sammy 5 in Cars & Transportation Commuting

4 answers

Given that you can walk about 4 mph easily, that distance could be covered in less than 1/2 and hour.

As said above, why not use Withrow? Shouldn't take but 20 minutes AT MOST.

2007-01-22 17:37:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Looked at the map, I would walk straight across withrow ave. Might take 30-45 minutes dependeing on how fast you walk,

2007-01-22 17:23:30 · answer #2 · answered by misc 75 3 · 0 0

6kmh is an average walking speed. At this speed you'll cover 1 km every 10 minutes or 100 metres every minute.

3.13km would therefore take you 31 minutes.

2007-01-23 00:42:52 · answer #3 · answered by Trevor 7 · 0 0

In basic arithmetic, there's a formula suggested as: d = rt d -> distance, r-> fee (of velocity), t -> time The formula is renamed in physics, even though it maintains to be an identical mathematically: ok, you already know the two the area you need to go (d), and the fee at which you're shifting (r). as a result, in an equation of three variables, there are 2 knowns (r and d) and one unknown (t). as a result, that's solvable, and you will use algebra. d = rt (sixteen) = (a million.2)t (plug in the two knowns) t = sixteen/a million.2 (divide the two components by using a million.2) t = 13.333

2016-12-12 18:14:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers