I think that is the most painful thing in the world and it doesn't need to labeled as a reminder to what they already think about every day.
2007-01-22 11:46:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by 2007 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
you're literally wonderful. there is no longer any reason those babies would want to be starving to lack of life. NONE! And, we've sufficient to feed those babies AND the aborted little ones, if we actual tried. the problem lies with those governments, WAYF, they're those starving those babies. optimal help despatched receives confiscated for the threat-free practices rigidity. so that you'll want responsible professional-lifers for this may be somewhat bit a stretch i'd say. want I remind you Christian charities provide the substantial help? also, those mom and pa at the prompt are not deliberately killing those babies, at the same time as abortion is an intentional act. inspite of the straightforward shown actuality that we do not see eye to eye in this difficulty, this little rant grew to change into into noticeably good, i wish some human beings were listening.
2016-10-15 23:14:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
My dad once said that they is no greater pain in the world than that of losing a child so I say a parent will always be a parent but once you've lost a child you become a devastated parent.
2007-01-22 18:16:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by angel h 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
They will always be a parent, when u marry u are just sharing ur life and when u lose ur parents u have lost someone who created u but once u have produced a life regardless of what happens to your child u will always be a parent
2007-01-22 11:53:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by louisem28 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A parent, of course! Just because the child dies, doesn't mean the parent didnt give birth (or be there for the birth, in Dad's case) and didn't raise that child.
I had a son. I was his Mom. I am still his Mom, even tho he is gone now.
2007-01-22 17:44:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by kiwi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They will always be a parent. There is no other name for it. I cannot imagine that one would want to be referred to as "parent of deceased child" . I am sorry for the loved ones who have to go through this. I know it is a very painful time. God Bless.
2007-01-22 11:55:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by LMnandez 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Exactly what you did before... they still are parents. They had the child, the mother carried the child in her womb for 9 months, they bought the child up.... whether they had 2 days or 22 years with their child they still are parents.... who will need your support for many years to come...
2007-01-22 11:53:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Fay 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
The only thing I know is grieving parent.
I don't know if there really is a term for a parent that has lost a child.
2007-01-22 11:48:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Spirit_Rain_3-SunShineAries 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Given the infant mortality rate throughout much of history I wonder if there was a need for a term.
A parent would cover it.
The fact you have asked the question says a lot about our age.
2007-01-22 11:46:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by mince42 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
A devastated parent
2007-01-22 11:48:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋