Theoretically, it can't prove the nature of the senses, because one would need the sensory perceptors to do so, and that would be circular reasoning. There are many things science can't prove, in fact--most of science is just educated guesses that work all known time, not self-evident logical truths (like Cogito Ergo Sum).
2007-01-22 09:31:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Theophile 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
probably nothing given enough time. science is based upon laws, theories ,hypothesis and experimentation. it honestly and unbiasedly seeks to explain the world we know. if there is another, heavenly, world beyond this, then someday, science will be able to prove or disprove it. that particular question falls into the realm of quantum theory. maybe heaven and hell are just opposite ends of all possible realities. maybe we get reborn into another reality, maybe we become worm food. no one has ever answered the question to my satifaction. you posed a truly deep question. btw,what can religion prove? science is way cool!
2007-01-22 10:23:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by rick m 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dozens of things. What anti-matter is. So many questions about black holes.
But I would "improve" your question to: What can't science prove YET. Because we're always upgrading. The beauty of science.
2007-01-22 09:31:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Black Parade Billie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science can't prove where from came the gases that caused the Big Bang!
2007-01-22 09:30:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The "Big Bang" wasn't caused by gases.
The big bang occurs when quantum energy
comes to a complete standstill and then
explodes.
A genetic center forms, and gases are the
first thing to show up because they have the
least number of electrons circling the atoms.
Thus, they have the least resistance, which is
why stars form before planets.
All energy forms have two stages: "quantum and
particle."
Time and space are merely by-products.
2007-01-22 10:13:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by kyle.keyes 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is nothing in the natural universe that the application of science as a mechanism for measuring and understanding cannot be applied to. It is the only adequate tool we have for looking at the universe.
2007-01-22 09:40:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Science has rarely, if ever, been right on anything....close, but not spot on.
Current science is the best explanation we have for explaining natural phenomena, but everything we know will almost surely be proven wrong at some point.
2007-01-22 09:32:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by mzJakes 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Can't prove Human Nature or why people act Unpredictably.
2007-01-22 09:29:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by tfoley5000 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
When? Today or tomorrow? I feel that science and mathematics will ultimately prove everything. Even the stuff we haven't seen or experienced yet.
2007-01-22 09:30:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Gene Rocks! 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
science doesnt prove.....it explains.
science doesnt prove gravity,it explains its effects so we can use it for other reasons.
it also doesnt prove electricity,,,or anyother thing,
a theory simply explains how things are probably working until a better one is thought just like aristotelian theory were rejected by copernicus and then newton.
2007-01-22 09:39:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by mageros 3
·
0⤊
0⤋