English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

yes, they should have to formally declare their allegiance to the flag in writing. if their religion prevents it then they shoudl go find a country that WILL let them in.

2007-01-22 08:36:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Yes they should not be allowed in the country if they cannot accept what this country stands for. They should have all legal documentation and if they are from certain countries they should not be allowed at all until the war is over. Than maybe those iraqi's and others who choose not to fight for their own country and come in our country will change their minds. Not forever....But we are in a time of war. For those that were not around during WW2 and Korean War.....All asians of that descent during the war was rounded up and put in camps until the war ended. You have radicals that get mixed and mingle within the normal society. If you are not allowed to profile muslim names and beliefs how are we to fight against those who threaten our country. To those who believe that the muslim religion is a peacefull religion, how do you answer this: Why does it state in the Koran that all that dont accept the muslim faith should be converted and then accepted only if they convert. They should be eliminated if they refuse to accept it. These words are not a direct quote, but you get the drift. To those who say most of all the muslims are peacefull....I ask you this......Do you know all muslims.....How do you know what they truly believe? In saying this, ask your muslim friends whether or not they would prefer muslim rule and law over the united states or the views that we now follow and most of us admire. I think you would be suprised on the answer they give. And please don't forget......A group of white Tim Mcveys did not get on a plane and blow up the twin towers.....All and i mean all were of middle eastern descent. Not only that.....if you were up on your history....there was really not a whole lot of evidence to support that Tim Mcvey acted alone in the oklahoma city bombing... He took all the fall. There were others involved and instead of continuing to find out who they were.....The critics got silenced by the death of Mcvey. Open your eyes and read between the lines.

to mr knoxville: I am assuming they were indians you are speaking of. If that is the case and that is a true statement made by an indian, wouldn't he technically be right in his statements. The white man did take his land.

To those who disagree with Christianity fine, it is your right and opinion. But for future reference, not once, not once does it state in the Bible that if you refuse Christianity than you should die. It actually states the exact opposite.... Show love and respect to your enemies......for example to "turn the other cheek" There was no references of any kind to murder those who dont believe in Christ in the Bible. Those that say so are liars and have not probably even read the Bible their selves. Most people who have that opinion either never read it or pick and choose what they want to believe. The statement that i used saying the Koran stated the fact that you will not be accepted if you don't accept the muslim religion and that you should be done away with came from multiple sources let alone multiple talk shows and newscasts. However you assuming the Bible says something to fit your agenda or opinion is incorrect. For you to tell us to go back east and bomb ourselves is not only stupid.....It shows the average ignorance i was speaking of in this nation. It was only greed and ignorance of the Bible and Gods word that proved to be the cause of the Crusades and most religious wars.

2007-01-22 08:57:23 · answer #2 · answered by Christopher H 1 · 0 0

Well, should UK have kicked out all Irish, or all Catholics, because of IRA terrorism? Would stopping all movement of people across the Irish Sea have made things better or worse? Muslims are human beings just like anyone else, some of them are focked up, something to do with recent history in Algeria, Bosnia, Chechnia, Palestine, Somalia, Iraq; some of all groups of people are focked up, we have to deal with the individuals not just take it out on a whole group.

That's exactly the result Osama and co wanted, to create a war between all Muslims and all Westerners, unfortunately that's just what Bush gave him.

If we blame all Muslims, we will never see an end to this problem. We need to find the criminals, and also rethink how rich countries deal with the world.

2007-01-22 10:51:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

(Conversation heard somewhere near the American Frontier, circa 1800)

Blue Cloud: "Should we put a stop to all land-stealing of White Europeans to this country, after witnessing the Iroquois's problems?"

Eagle Feather: "Yes they should not be allowed in the country if they cannot accept what this country stands for. They should have all legal documentation and if they are from certain countries they should not be allowed at all until the war is over"

White Bear Cub: "yes, they should have to formally declare their allegiance to the flag in writing. if their religion prevents it then they shoudl go find a country that WILL let them in"

Eagle Feather: "Why does it state in the Bible that all that dont accept the Christian faith should be converted and then accepted only if they convert. They should be eliminated if they refuse to accept it. These words are not a direct quote, but you get the drift. To those who say most of all the Christians are peacefull....I ask you this......Do you know all Christians?.....How do you know what they truly believe? In saying this, ask your Christian friends whether or not they would prefer Christian rule and law over the Cherokee or the views that we now follow and most of us admire"

Howling Owl: "I think that they should be subject to more scrutiny than others and maybe even prevented from entry"

Squealing Boar: "YES!!!!!"

Fearful Deer: "The Christians in the country do nothing but complain about our culture anyway. They should all **** off back to the east where they belong.

Let them blow themselfs up over there, not here."

2007-01-22 09:06:01 · answer #4 · answered by Malcolm Knoxville 2 · 1 1

I think that they should be subject to more scrutiny than others and maybe even prevented from entry. Before you jump on the issue of race let me point out this fact, auto insurance, home owners, and health insurance all base their rates on statistics in other words they profile so doesn't it make since that a country in order to make wise choices should us statistics also. It is a common practice in most businesses and no one even complains so what is the difference? All people who are CITIZENS should have the rights guaranteed by the Constitution even if they are Muslim.

2007-01-22 08:49:52 · answer #5 · answered by joevette 6 · 0 0

NO. just because they are muslims it doesnt necessarily means that they are terroists or whatever. i am a muslim and i would never participate in such activities. they are muslims from other parts of the world other than the middle east too. i feel for america to know that it is slowly being destroyed by the threats and acts of these monsters who refers to themselves as "muslims". actually I would say their not. Islam is a religion of peace and does not associate itself with guns and ammunitions and terroism and blowing up buildings.i know its tough for most ppl to change their view on Islam but i dont think that immigration of muslims to this country should be stopped. like most immigrants they do come here for a better life and most of them are proud to be american citizens .

2007-01-22 08:43:00 · answer #6 · answered by ♥рίиk♥βΰββℓέgυм♥ 5 · 1 0

Ha! Good luck, nobody is paying anything any attention, especially the wishes of Legitimate American citizens.
Go to NumbersUsa.com, alipac.com, v-dare.com ..the rich will not be immediately affected, until they come after them and take their money from them.

Globalist is another word for Communist and those advocating for it, never pay attention to anything but their pockets, until it is too late and think they would be exempt..... The Romanoffs of Russia were a good example!

2007-01-22 09:42:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

america has defended Kuwait - a Muslim united states of america, and Kosovo - a Muslim united states of america. america or its electorate were attacked in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Lebanon, Somalia, and the united statesS. Cole become attacked off the seashores of Yemen. The U.S. ought to no longer attack Iran or Syria, and they'd be insane to achieve this, nor have they were given the manpower for it because they're too busy with Iraq on the prompt. Your retaining that the U.S. is about to attack Iran and Syria is organic hypothesis and has no foundation if truth be told in any way. The U.S. will go away the occupied countries at the same time as a sturdy democratic authorities has been time-honored there. The U.S. and its coalition allies went after the Taliban because the Taliban harbored the CRIMINALS who attacked the U.S. on September eleventh, 2001. The U.S. went after Iraq because it become licensed to achieve this through the United countries protection Council. america does no longer attack countries because they're Muslim - they attack countries because they're of challenge to the protection and protection of america or its allies. I assure you - the U.S. does no longer want to be interested in this, yet after the 9/11 attacks it feels that it has to take care of itself in even if thoughts are mandatory. i in my opinion disagree with countless the approaches that were used, yet in u . s . of america we've this stuff noted as "elections" the position we replace who our leaders are through balloting them out of workplace if we don't love the way they're operating issues. interior the previous election right here, we voted rather some our leaders out of a job. through the way - i did not vote for our modern president, and our modern elections were a demonstration that rather some something else of the country disagrees mutually with his overseas coverage in Iraq. which will be perplexing to understand from outdoors the country, although that is real.

2016-10-15 23:01:24 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No. What we should do is STOP invading, exploiting, and supporting corrupt governments in other countries, so the citizens of those countries do not feel the need to leave their homeland in search of a better life.

2007-01-22 08:42:23 · answer #9 · answered by freeThinker 1 · 2 1

Hell no, muslims are some of the most peaceful and god fearing people on the planet. Dont let the media fool you. There is a small minority of radical muslims that practice terrorism but there are terrorist of all races. Timothy Mcvey is a white american and he blew up the Oklahoma City building.

2007-01-22 08:37:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Sure, and Hispanics too.Only allow White Anglo-Saxon Protestants in,Then when your economy collapses because there's no-one to do the dirty work,the world will be a better place all around.

2007-01-22 08:47:53 · answer #11 · answered by kevin k 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers