But they don't believe it should be outlawed? I do NOT believe spanking is child abuse but I don't understand how people can say it is child abuse and it shouldn't be outlawed. I mean, you either support spanking or you don't right? Does that mean they think child abuse should be legal?
Before you ask I feel spanking is a very effective form of discipline.
Parent's don't want to spank but it is sometimes necessary
Parent's don't spank to hurt their children...they do it to get their attention.
Parents who spank also use other forms of discipline.
Parents who spank aren't afraid of disciplining their children.
Parent's who don't spank have perfect children (yeah right)
Parent's who don't spank are more concerned about being friends with their children rather than parents.
Parent's who don't spank have very young children and haven't been put in that situation yet (That used to be me)
But then again, that is just my opinion?
2007-01-22
08:04:54
·
31 answers
·
asked by
TRUE PATRIOT
6
in
Pregnancy & Parenting
➔ Parenting
Spanking is different than:
beating
hitting
smacking
2007-01-22
08:17:28 ·
update #1
I just wanted to say that I was spanked as a child BUT I was spanked for EVERYTHING. There was no other form of discipline...There was no talking or explaining...There was no I love you. That is why I always said I would never spank my kids. But then my son turned 3 and WAS way out of control and disrespectful to everyone. He would run into the street, put things in light sockets, hit others (wow, can you believe he actually hit others before he was ever spanked...There goes your little theory anti-spankers.
My point is, there is a time and place for spanking.
2007-01-22
08:21:17 ·
update #2
I totally agree that there is a time and a place for spanking! kids will be kids, and that's to be expected. but when they absolutely will not mind, and are running all over you, you have to do something to get their attention. and if spanking gets their attention, then I feel that's the proper approach.
you have to find what works for you. my daughter always thought spanking was fun, and didn't take it seriously. so it wasn't the best form of dicipline for me to use. I found that sending her to her room was much more effective. every child is different, therefore what works on one child may not work on another.
Best Wishes! and good question and info.
2007-01-22 11:14:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by atiana 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
I don't have a problem with spanking just when people do it for every single thing. I think between the ages of 3 and 5 kids need to be spanked sometimes but over 5 you should be able to communicate with your child. I think a lot of people spank because they don't know anything else to do. Spanking is a lazy way to parent if that is your only tactic. I think we should teach our children right from wrong-the key word being teach. Teaching respect is always better than fear, what will a parent who only spanks do if they are in a position where they can't spank, i.e. paralyzed, injured, the child is too big? Some kids that I know who get spanked too much act out more when they are with someone who can't spank them like at school, baby sitter etc. That is because they are being taught fear and not respect and empathy. I do spank my children and I think that they need it sometimes but I only spank them as a last resort, after talking, grounding, taking privileges, time out. etc. does not get the message across. I only spank my kids once or twice a year. Sometimes it is necessary. But from my experience I have had better results by talking to my children and helping them understand why something is wrong.
2007-01-22 09:10:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Roni 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
I figure as a parent its your choice on how you choose to discipline them. I do disagree with your statements that ...
(Parent's who don't spank have perfect children) I have a 4 year old and a almost 17 year old. Perfect...no. Good...yes. My son doesn't smoke, drink, do drugs. He gets good grades (A and B's) Does not get in trouble in school, never in a fight. Yes, he is a pain in the *** teenager sometimes but he is a good kid.
I could say...Parent's who spank have kids who get in fights, exhibit violent tendency's , resist authority. Its what I observe but I don't want to stereotype.
(Parent's who don't spank are more concerned about being friends with their children rather than parents.) Not true. I always made it clear to my children that though I will listen to there side I will be first on the side of the teacher or other authority. My daughter (4) is always telling me that I am her best friend and I Always remind her that we can be friendly but she IS NOT my friend, I am her Mother. I find Time out and explaining what not to do to be much more affective for a young child. With my son, telling him once was usually enough...my daughter, well, that's a different story.
(Parent's who don't spank have very young children and haven't been put in that situation yet) Like I said 16 and 4.
I remember when my son was 8 and my father asked when I was going to start spanking. He warned I would have trouble if I didn't. We were always spanked as were my 2 stepbrothers. I asked him if he still had trouble with the boys (then young teenagers) and he said "yes, all the time" They get in fights in school, troublemakers. So, it doesn't work for everyone.
Each kid is different but I do believe that spanking does teach violence. My daughters teachers tell me that she is the little mother, stopping others in preschool from hitting, pushing or yelling. She tells them that hitting is wrong. And it is.
But then again, that is just my opinion!
2007-01-22 08:38:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
I do not spank, I do not think spanking is an effective form of discipline for my family but I do not think that all spanking is child abuse. I do believe that in some cases spanking can lead to child abuse if a person takes it too far which is much more likely to happen with some who spank than with someone who does not. As for your statements I think you have too many absolutes that do not apply to all or many.
"Parents who spank also use other forms of discipline" - this is not always the cause there a those out there who only yell and spank and no other means of discipline are used.
"Parents who don't spank are more concerned about being friends with their children rather than parents" - this is NOT the case in my family and many other families you are just assuming something that is clearly not a true statement in plenty of non spanking families. My children are not perfect (as I am sure your spanked children are not) but they are well behaved. I do not see my children as friends and I never will; I think that once you cross the line of friend verses parent you are in a world of trouble.
"Parents who spank aren't afraid of disciplining their children." - I believe in some cases that is exactly why they spank because they are afraid to take the time necessary to discipline their children by other means and resort to hitting instead this of course is not always the case some parents use many means of discipline including spanking.
As for spanking being outlawed I definitely who not be opposed to legislature that said hitting a 1 or 2 year old was abuse because I do believe that at such a young age that is all that is can be considered. At that age babies/toddlers do not have the understanding, verbal skills and impulse control necessary to get anything out of spanking other than the person I trust most in life is hurting me and I can't understand why.
2007-01-22 08:42:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Courtney 5
·
2⤊
4⤋
Spanking itself is fine but what about the parents who use it as an outlet for their own anger then it crosses the line into abuse. My stepdad beat me with a belt when i was a kid and i had dark black bruise from my hip down almost to my knee caps for a misunderstanding my aunt was trying to start crap. It also needs to be age apporiate, i mean do you spank a 13 yr old when taking things away are more effective. Some times it is a fine line between spanking and abuse.
2007-01-22 08:16:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by chiefs fan 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
I am not a 'hitter.' Frankly, I can tolerate a 'swat' if a child reaches for something on a hot stove; or reaches into a fan. However...I am concerned that a lot of questions on Y/A are from S&M-type folks who 'get off' on bare-bottom spankings of their children. That is not good! Get your spouse to consent to a 'bare bottom spanking.' If your spouse enjoys it; and you 'get off' on it; then everybody is happy! And you do not have to involve a small child in your "pleasure!" The small child will appreciate this, as well!
2016-05-23 22:26:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The problem is that there are so many ways to define "spanking." A beating with a belt is one thing, one open-handed swat on the upper thigh is another. Also, the frequency of using "spanking" is another question. Is it done on a daily basis -- or once every 3 to 6 months in dire situations? The spectrum between what is a simple "spanking" and what constitutes abuse is very broad. I don't spank my daughter (who is almost 3), but I have given her a light, single swat on the thigh once or twice to get her attention if she's misbehaving badly and I'm trying to change her diaper or if she refuses to stop playing with something dangerous.... Is this spanking?
My father beat us with his belt as a form of discipline. I do not approve of this and I would NEVER do this to my child, but I think a simple swat with an open hand on the thigh or tush is not even in the same ballpark as physical abuse. Before they can make it illegal, they have to clearly define it.
2007-01-22 08:25:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by shanequinox 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
And this is what it is, just your opinion. Spanking is a gateway that can lead to abuse. I think it is a form of abuse.
Again, another "I was spanked and turned out fine." arguement. I know alot of children (now adults) that were spanked and did not turn out fine. Parents who don't use any discipline at all are the ones that have problems with their children. Not the ones who aren't spanked. All children need discipline on hundreds of occasions but there are alternatives to spanking. Redirecting (distracting) the child, taking away a privilege, or sending a child to his or her room are some of the other ways to discipline. We can raise children to be agreeable, responsible, productive adults without ever spanking them. My children are never spanked and they are confident, well behaved, happy children. I am not their best friend nor do I want to be. We always get compliments on how well behaved they are. I use time-out, removing privileges and talk to them. Most kids I see today that are aggressive, defiant, hellions are the ones that have parents who spank. I have worked with children for 16 years. Spanking does not work long term and hitting is NOT BIBLICAL. You really have to look at the research and see today that spanking is not recommended by pediatricians, psychologists and child care professionals.
2007-01-22 08:47:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
5⤋
Spanking is such a touchy subject. It's one of those things IF used correctly can be an effective form of discipline. However, many parents do not do this correctly.
Did you see that Super Nanny show where the mother was not in control but would "spank" her children whenever she reached her breaking point? It was pretty scary. That's not effective but I feel consistency is.
There is such a fine line between abuse and spanking it's hard to figure it out. How can you be consistent with spanking only? When does spanking become abuse? Why is it fine to hit a child but it's domestic violence to hit your spouse? It just doesn't add up.
Many parents who do spank don't think about it. It's just another thing that they do in a day. I feel that if you need to spank children often you are failing them just as much as a parent who has their child in time-out often.
I believe spanking should be used sparingly. Like I said before if you have to spank your child every day obviously something is wrong and it’s NOT an effective form of discipline and the same goes for time-outs or whatever disciplining measure someone does.
I’m 100% against spanking now but both of my boys are still young. When they reach the age where they can be reasoned with but choose to go a different path we’ll see what happens.
I also hate the two way stereotype. Parents who choose not to spank will tell parents who do they are unloving or selfish YET parents who spank will tell parents who choose not to that they [non-spankers] are going to have rotten kids. I feel we should all do what is right for our own families. For now and hopefully forever I will be against spanking my children.
2007-01-22 08:25:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by .vato. 6
·
5⤊
5⤋
I think it isnt child abuse to a point. I mean I can understand if you hit with warning but harshly hitting shouldnt be legal. I dont have kids or anything but I used to get hit all the time for no reason and so I guess I could understand what your talking about.
2007-01-22 08:09:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by ♥ 1
·
2⤊
0⤋