English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A babysitter is there to take care of your child/children when you are not present such as working mothers or just a night out. Nanny's on the other hand are there taking care of a child while the parent is present, such is the case with most celebrities. If the parent/parents are present why have a nanny when instead the child could be cared for by the parents. Is child development and child care no longer in the hands of parents anymore, specially those who are in high society?

2007-01-22 07:15:39 · 15 answers · asked by Enterrador 4 in Pregnancy & Parenting Parenting

15 answers

Nanny's are for people who want children, but don't want to commit themselves 100% to look after them. Rather selfish actually.

2007-01-22 07:46:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I have 4 kids and no nanny. I have problems getting a babysitter as I will only allow grandparents and certain aunts and uncles to watch my children. I had my children so that I could love, teach and raise them into adulthood not someone else. I have to say I would love to be able to afford a housekeeper though. Then I would not have such a hard time struggling to fit in school programs, doctors, sports, dance class, me and hubby time, me time, groceries, cooking, pets, cleaning and laundry. Wow it is no wonder I am tired all the time. Ah well, I still love my life, and would not have it any other way. So I don't understand the nanny thing either. If the nanny is there for the child 100% of the time why mom cooks and cleans, why not hire a housekeeper and mom can be there for her kids. That is just the way I feel about it though. I think everyone should do what they feel is right for them and their family, as long as everyone is happy and healthy.

2007-01-22 15:34:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Wow. As a nanny and a human being I am personally insulted by many of the responses on this page.

I have worked for many families, though I have yet to work for a rich family.

The last family I worked for had many children of varying ages, and two parents who worked full time. I'm sure they enjoyed being able to come home at the end of the day and relax with their well cared for and loved children, instead of running around doing meals and dishes and homework etc.

The current family I work for is a single mother with one young child, who works nights and needs someone to give her a hand around the house. That means cooking, cleaning and playing with her daughter, so that she can go to work while the girl is asleep and catch a bit of sleep herself in the early morning hours.
Yes, I sometimes watch the girl while she is present...but only so that she can take a hot bath, or look around the store while we play in the toy section etc. She works hard and doesn't get much time to herself. I'm glad I can be there to help.

I think that it is awfully rude of people to assume that just because someone has a nanny means that they don't love or have time for their child. In actuality, people hire nannys so that when they can't be there, they know their child is in good hands, and when they are there, they can be a person in addition to being a parent.

Shame on you all.

2007-01-22 16:05:36 · answer #3 · answered by IamBatman 4 · 0 0

It sounds like there is a lot of responses from people that have the luxury of staying home to take care of their children. I don't personally have a nanny, however, know several people that do. It is not only for "rich" people, but those that would rather have someone in their home taking care of their children, rather than placing them in a daycare for 8 to 10 hours a day. Nannies usually work a certain amount of hours a day, then are free to do what they want after the parents get home. If you have the space in your home, it is very comparable in price to full time daycare outside your home. In today's society, many families need two incomes not to have all the things they "want", but to afford the basics and maybe a little more, like a yearly vacation, a decent home in a good neighborhood, involvement in sports and outside activities for their children.

I really believe those that judge other's decisions should really look at themselves and decide if they are doing the "best" thing for their family and children.

2007-01-22 15:35:09 · answer #4 · answered by luveeduvee 4 · 0 0

Not necessarily. A nanny is someone who takes care of your child in your home, while you are at work. Some people feel they need help so they may have a nanny present so they dont feel overwhelmed.

2007-01-22 15:19:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Well, let me tell you what. This sounds all very modern America... but it's easier to care for someone else's than your own. We can be very impatient with our own, famous or not, and some of us have histories of abuse.
If there's no grandparent or aunt right there to step in when the parent is ready to blow her/his lid, this is a great idea!
And remember, there is at least one society I know of in which the whole society leaves the kids at a kibbutz, and the parents come to visit!!
Go figure that out! And there does not seem to be a problem over there, at least with that.
So, hey, at least kids with a nanny get one special person assigned to them, eh?

2007-01-22 16:01:32 · answer #6 · answered by starryeyed 6 · 0 0

Because the nanny is devoted only to the child for the whole entire day. Parents that dont use a nanny cant actually spend every single minute with the child, they have to clean and do laundry and cook, etc. Personally I think parents should raise their own children instead of rely on other people to take care of them, If you dont have the time for children dont have them.

2007-01-22 15:20:54 · answer #7 · answered by ehrlich 6 · 3 2

Nannies also cook meals and clean house. They do your laundry and make sure things are tidy. My friend has one and I think she's one lucky chick! I have another friend who has one there to help her out during the day while her hubby is gone so she can get things done around the house and errands for her hubby's business.

I'm planning on having one for the first six months after my baby is born. My son and this baby will be very close in age 16 months apart. My husband's family lives in India so there will be no help from them. And, my family is taking care of my elderly grandparents and I can expect no more than a week or two of help. My last delivery was excruitating and it took me 7 months to recover. And, as soon as that happened I became pregnant again...just being prepared...

2007-01-22 15:21:26 · answer #8 · answered by Baby #3 due 10/13/09 6 · 2 2

they help out a lot and pick up the kids from school while the parent(s) are busy and help w/homework... kinda like a mix between a parent and a babysitter. its rly a good idea, not bad or anything. some people jsut need some extra help and time for other things.

2007-01-22 16:18:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have a nanny for my son because I work out of my home or just because I need some time to myself. Just because you're home doesn't mean you need to be catering to your child 24/7.

2007-01-22 16:50:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

sometimes wealthy, affluent people hire nannies to help care for their children, like the little things, such as preparing them for bed by making sure they brush their teeth, or make them breakfast if they have to be out early and need them to be watched. people with busy schedules usually hire a nanny, but miss out on helping their kids throughout the day. nannies really are hired for full time care... so parents have the opportunity to take advantage of their care and not want to make time for their children.

2007-01-22 15:23:48 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers