LOL Not that I agree with your logic but it is fun to see how many people missed your point.
2007-01-22 06:30:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Love Shepherd 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I once talked to a liberal who said that a child should not be considered a life until the birth certificate is officially issued. Basically meaning that if a woman gave birth naturally and the chid was killed a few minutes later that no crime was committed. He was serious by the way.
Do you feel the same way?
2007-01-22 06:10:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. A birth certificate is just that -- birth. The indication that a human being is no longer attached to its mother.
That doesn't mean it's not human until its separated from its mother. It just means that humans spend approximately nine months dependant on the mother.
2007-01-22 06:07:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No actually, that hadn't occured to me.
The birth certificate is issued following a live birth.
2007-01-22 06:14:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Char 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Many Protestant religions don't think in unique Sin -- so the stainless theory isn't a controversy for them. lots of the instructions of the Catholic Church are no longer certainly interior the Bible -- yet shop on with logically from what's there. i think of that the assumption of the stainless theory follows logically from the have faith that Jesus is God -- and God does no longer be carried by using a woman whose soul replaced into marked with sin. As for Mary ultimate a Virgin, there are 2 rationalization why Catholics have faith she stayed a virgin mutually as Protestants think of that she had different little ones. the 1st reason is composed of translation blunders and the 2nd reason is that Protestants have excluded books from the Bible that recommend that she remained a virgin. First -- the translation blunders. The KJV says that Mary had no relatives with Joseph till Jesus replaced into born. In English, that's implied that they DID have relatives after his start. although, interior the unique Greek, there is not any such implication. The KJV additionally refers back to the brothers of Jesus. although, the unique Greek makes use of a be conscious that for the period of straightforward terms potential 'close relative.' Catholics have faith that those human beings are cousins. The Apocrypha has been area of the Catholic Bible using fact the Bible replaced into finalized on the Council of Rome interior the fourth century. Protestants have thrown out those books. yet in a form of books, Mary expresses concerns over her marriage to Joseph using fact she has taken a vow of virginity. Catholics have faith that the mummy of Jesus will possibly in no way ruin a vow to God -- so she might have remained a virgin -- even after the start of Jesus.
2016-11-01 00:11:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hasn't been born yet. I'd amend the name a 'life' certificate or something equivalent.
Edit: Oo oo! Soul certificates.
2007-01-22 06:08:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Phil 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not a bad idea considering miscarried fetuses are issued death certificates
2007-01-22 06:10:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it would save one child, yes but there would be many answers left blank until birth.
Abortion might be legal in the world but when you face God you will be punished.
2007-01-22 06:13:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Alex 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, because you never know if the pregnacy will make it to term. Also, if not, there is no need to name the fetus.
2007-01-22 06:05:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by adiahudo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would have to be a "life" certificate.
2007-01-22 06:54:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋