Doesn't it take alot of faith to believe human beings came into existantce by random chance?

Question

How can a person not see faith believing that humans came into existance by chance over millions of years without no guidence.

Thats what it teaches.

Answer 1

It really isn't hard to believe when you look at the Universe as being immensely huge. With all of the numbers of planets and possibilities, it is probably more likely for evolution to take place on one planet than it is for it to not have taken place at all.

Answer 2

hello. Very happy you're thinking approximately this as your understand-how is obviously way greater advantageous than that of maximum people who ask questions approximately this. the standard of solutions you have gotten is in direct relation to the standard of the question. as nicely to what others have published, I opt to furnish you this... As you suggested, mutations prevail or fail depending on organic determination which isn't random. Like others have suggested, the mutations themselves are purely partly random on the grounds that some are greater probable than others. yet one final factor to realize is THAT there are mutations isn't random. Mutations are the effect of a gene's much less-than-appropriate constancy. What do I recommend by using this and why is it significant? If our genes copied themselves with appropriate constancy, there may be no mutations to speak of. for this reason, there may be no version and without version there may be no organic determination and no speciation. quickly, there may be no evolution... it may be impossible. So is this an establishing for a author to describe this "needed infidelity?" in no way. think of billions of years in the past with 2 separate replicators superb out interior the primordial ooze. One replicates itself completely each and every time mutually as the different replicates itself completely ninety 9.9% of the time. Which one is going to have greater adaptable "offspring" able to surviving in distinctive environments? I could wish the respond is sparkling. And why? organic determination. it relatively is the *imperfection* of the device that makes it artwork. the marvelous factor i might decide for to depart you with is a few numbers to back up what somebody else replaced into asserting approximately sexual duplicate. Scientists estimate that each and every human is able to producing 2^23 (8,388,608) unique intercourse cells. this suggests that for the period of sexual duplicate one couple on my own has the flexibility to make 2^23 * 2^23 = 2^40 six unique little ones. it relatively is 70,368,804,177,664 obtainable combos representing that many obtainable offspring from 2 human beings. See, whether there is an factor to randomness, it is not that vast of a deal using fact it continues to be biology. the opportunities have been a million:70,368,804,177,664 of you being you -- and look, there you're. And had it been any of the 70,368,804,177,663 different opportunities, they could have been blown away by using the opportunities too.

Answer 3

I've never met anyone who believed that human beings came into existence by random chance. We came into existence as the result of evolution.

If you think that's the same thing, you need to stop listening to the liars who are deliberately deceiving you about science, and go study some real science.

Your lesson for the day:
organized creationism is mere propaganda, and its workers are paid liars.

Answer 4

The only evidence for the faith based story is a self contadictory cobbled togther book which makes a lot of totally implausible statements. (people living to be 900 years old, first humans having no belly buttons, world wide flood, 600 year old earth etc)

Answer 5

Evolution does not propose that humans came into existance by random chance. Survival of the fittest is not random.

As fro what evolution really says, I don't believe it to be so, I understand it to be so, so no faith is required.

Answer 6

The guidance lies in the simple laws of nature and survival of the fittest. No designer or creator necessary.

Which takes more faith - people from single cells (which we know exist) working in accordance with the basic laws of nature or people from dirt by magical powers outside the realm of nature? I just have to go with what makes sense here.

Answer 7

All the prerequisites for primitive life-amino acids etc. - have been spontaneously created in laboratories that simulated the atmosphere of earth millions of years ago. Considering the time scale of tens of millions of years it would be next to impossible that life HADN'T emerged on the planet, and once it did evolution took over.

Answer 8

That would be rather poor thinking...

good thing that isn't what Evolutionary Theory teaches.

Hint: Organisms with mutations being selected and leading to humans is not "random chance" and Natural selection is not "no guidance".

Answer 9

Quote from: Mark Twain

"You believe in a book that has talking animals, wizards, witches, demons, sticks turning into snakes, burning bushes, food falling from the sky, people walking on water, and all sorts of magical, absurd and primitive stories, and you say we are the ones that need help?"

Answer 10

All it takes is a little education and a desire to know the truth, whatever the truth might be.

I learned years ago that the only thing that faith will bring you is disappointment.