Why do people respond to that garbage why dont they just report him and ignore him? OO
2007-01-21 21:05:12 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Truly is two points worth soothing a raciest bigot shame. OO
2007-01-21 21:15:49 · update #1
You are absolutely right!
2007-01-21 21:09:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I actually miss the question thumbs down specifically for the purpose of lambasting questions like that. However, Yahoo in its infinite wisdom [ha!] decided to remove that feature.
2007-01-22 06:21:25 · answer #2 · answered by Lunarsight 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why not get 2 points before you hit report?
2007-01-22 05:10:07 · answer #3 · answered by Sheryl 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I generally don't report unless the question is completely illegible.
Racism is bad but freedom of speech is good.
Let the idiots expose themselves for what they are.
And on that note, who died and made YOU moral guardian of the world?
2007-01-22 05:21:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's about points and freedom of speech, And being a ray of hope for those who have none and may be looking for some.
If you feel that way don't stress bout it, just do what i do, read on.
2007-01-22 05:34:41 · answer #5 · answered by saynhope 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For the same reason I'm responding to your non-question -- it's two points.
Edit: It's "racist." And I don't soothe them. I insult them.
2007-01-22 05:09:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because I want two points.
2007-01-22 05:11:41 · answer #7 · answered by couchP56 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Usually, I write a nasty reply and then hit report. It sooths me.
2007-01-22 05:09:06 · answer #8 · answered by Mr. NoneofYourbusiness 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Thanx for the advice.
2007-01-22 05:17:14 · answer #9 · answered by rajesh bhowmick 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did.
2007-01-22 05:10:57 · answer #10 · answered by Dakota Lynn Takes Gun 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋