English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

should people over 21-35 live with parents just so they can save money for future e.g. house, wedding etc

2007-01-21 19:07:15 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting Parenting

13 answers

there's a creature similar to a slug that lives in lakes and rivers called a "leech". this is what came to mind when reading your question. also, the word "sponge" is applicable. how about independence and self-reliance. that's worth more than the money someone can save living at home.

2007-01-21 21:18:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Your child is your child from birth onwards. As a parent this person is your responsibility, it is your job to help them become a productive member of society. My first car cost more than my parents first house. I lived with my parents until I got married (very late 20's), and I am a college graduate. There are some areas where it is impossible to find affordable housing.

I do not think there is anything wrong with adult children living with their parents to maximize their future. I am also the mother of a special needs child who could very well be with me for the rest of their life, or someone I may have to help fund living on their own. They are my child, and I will do everything I can for them, and I will do the same for their sibling, who currently has no problems. I am their parent and want them to have the best life possible.

2007-01-21 19:25:36 · answer #2 · answered by RiddleMeThis 3 · 2 1

Debatable. If you have to i suppose it's a good idea, but asking for xtra money might not a great idea, co you're living in their house. BUT, if your parents are more elderly (70>) it would probably be a good idea to live with them. Check out the magazine bits of newspapers and you might find a few articles..... I think there's a acronym for it like YUPPies (Young Urban Professional People)

2007-01-21 19:19:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This type of arrangement can make good financial sense (particularly in this day and age when it is more difficult for young people to get their finances solid than it was in previous generations).

If it works for the grown son or daughter and works for the parents and everybody agrees its a good way to go - then sure.

When parents and their grown kids are all secure about the independence of the grown child and don't feel they need to prove anything to anybody they are sure enough of themselves to know that living under the same roof does not necessarily have to equal lack of independence.

2007-01-21 21:06:08 · answer #4 · answered by WhiteLilac1 6 · 1 1

I feel that it is ok for children to live with parent's especially for the purpose of buying a house, and or getting married. Look at what they are trying to do, and how long they need to live with you. I feel it is ok for them to live at home for no longer than two years to save for a house, and or wedding. If either is to expensive, and will take longer than I'd say no go. It's all up to the individual's envolved. Good Luck.

2007-01-21 19:17:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

i'd bypass more suitable on difficulty than age. adult little ones coping with transitional circumstances (purely out of school/ improving from a divorce/ and so on). If, no matter if, living with mom and pa has lengthy previous from "transitional era" to "way of existence" then that is time to nudge them out. No, i does no longer fee employ. as a results of very actuality of what I purely defined... those are people down on their success in any case. Plus, husbands and distinct halves do no longer fee one yet another employ -- as a replace it particularly is named pitching in, and that is what adult little ones ought to do too. very last 12 months I lived with my grandparents. My grandfather had lengthy previous through way of surgical operation and that i grew to change into into between careers -- it grew to change into into transitional era the position we both benefited. Come the end of the summer season time, it grew to change into into time for us both to ascertain more suitable perm. arrangements -- I moved into my very personal position and they are actual getting some thoughts some situations a week.

2016-10-15 22:26:02 · answer #6 · answered by vesely 4 · 0 0

No. By 21, an adult child should be on his own being responsible.

2007-01-22 01:00:29 · answer #7 · answered by KathyS 7 · 0 1

no, why in the world havent you gotten married before 35?? good lord, you dont need to waste money on a big wedding. people are so crazy

2007-01-21 21:07:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I would say that 25+ is pushing it. Ideally, you should be out on your own with a good job by 21.

2007-01-21 20:47:24 · answer #9 · answered by Lucille 1 · 1 1

No,unless they are going to school. I whole point of being an adult is to become independent. You can't learn that by still living with your parents.

2007-01-21 19:14:11 · answer #10 · answered by lily_shaine 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers