I need to hear all kinds of opinions and thoughts.
2007-01-21 18:10:54 · 24 answers · asked by carrie_livingston 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
No, it's wrong to have had multiple partners by the age of 31.
Remember, - the term "wrong" has connotations of moral judgment, - and if dedicating yourself to your future spouse is wrong, - then you're wrong.
The loose women of today don't believe that there's anything worthy to be called "right" or "wrong", so the question itself is preposterous to them.
2007-01-21 18:14:33 · answer #1 · answered by MK6 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion, no it is not wrong, weird, abnormal etc to wait to have sex, be a virgin, practice celibacy or abstain from sex till marriage/right committed relationship or just because. Simply because it is your body, your life, your choice.
Sex can be so good yes, but so overrated. There is no set time limit to when you should have sex. It is society that's puts these pressures on men and women.There are many other cultures and faiths worldwide that practically worship the "virgin" Virgins were always the prize, the perfect sacrifice in fables and tales. Their innocence was a gift, a blessing, by some its still worshiped (the virgin Mary...yeah you get the idea.)
My dear relax, enjoy your "treasure" as my mom used to call it. When you are ready you will know. Besides you at your age, you will appreciate it and understand the responsibilities more when you do decide to "go all the way".
P.S. My best friend-lost virginity at 29 ( male)
My cousin happily married virgin at 36! (female)
You guys are like Jedi Knights- the force is strong with you!!! LOL!
Amarie
2007-01-22 02:30:30 · answer #2 · answered by amarie828 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Virginity is not a wrong or right, it is a state.
You should not make losing virginity an objective. The objective should be a life objective of finding someone to spend enjoy your life and sexuality with.
2007-01-22 02:18:41 · answer #3 · answered by Ron H 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah it's preety wrong. People on this site are overly nice to try and get best awnsers, but the truth is that 500+ years ago 30+ in age was considered old age.
Your senses are only dulling, but if you're happy then it doesn't matter.
If you don't mate, nature will weed your genes out of existance.
2007-01-22 02:18:21 · answer #4 · answered by goiowa6 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I'm 27 and still am a virgin. It's not considered normal in either of our cases but there's nothing 'wrong' with it necessarily.
2007-01-22 02:15:21 · answer #5 · answered by Lisardo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not wrong, but can be damned frustrating. 31 years is not a lot more off than 25 years...
2007-01-22 02:19:54 · answer #6 · answered by cheeze_rulz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Goooooooooooooooooood
2007-01-22 02:16:37 · answer #7 · answered by Saood 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's best to wait until marriage, or at least love. It's your body so it's your choice whether or not you have sex. There is nothing wrong with it. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.
2007-01-22 02:17:54 · answer #8 · answered by Appono Astos 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
to be or not to be a virgin is personal choice and as long as u r happy with ur choice then nothing wrong with it
2007-01-22 02:14:19 · answer #9 · answered by vakere2 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's absolutely nothing wrong with it. Sometimes it takes a while to find that special person.
2007-01-22 02:15:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋