Did Man really landed on the moon 30years ago or was it a Drama?

Question

If it really happened so, why is there not even a single attempt so far to go to the moon again with the present technology and advancement which we didn't had 30years ago?

Answer 1

IT WAS A REAL INCIDENT. DUDE, DON'T BELIEVE THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES,. NOW A DAYS IT HAS BECOME FASHION FOR SOME PEOPLE TO PROPAGATE LIES AGAINST ESTABLISHED TRUTHS.BROWSE THE NET YOU WILL FIND OUT WHAT IS TRUTH.

Answer 2

I want to believe that it had really happend that man landed on the moon 30 years ago. True that we had much lower level of technology at that time but hey were enough to put us on the surface of the moon. Why we didn't take another attempt after the first was naturally answered. It wasn't rewarding to spend so much of money at that level of our advancement. Perhaps we might go there again after few more years if we find the moon a suitable hub better than the space. Now we could easily use the vast expace of the Space without any gravity problems of the moon as well as the landing and take off problems there. Notwitstanding the doubts on the whole adventure, I believe that man landed on the moon, because that was the only acheive ment to compensate the destructions we had managed through the world wars of the century.

Answer 3

Well, ordinarily I only use this forum as an outlet for the surreal 'smartassishness' I feel compelled to perpetrate on the generally inept and unthoughtful people that insist on asking others to solve their personal problems for them. However, in this case I find the automated and uninformed responses to a genuinely inquisitive and relevant query to be a little disconcerting in the least. Without going into great depth concerning this subject I would like to say that there is certainly room for reasonable doubt when looking at the question of whether or not people actually visited the moon in 1969. First, it's necessary to ask oneself if it would have been easier and more economical to fake a moon landing or to actually go to the moon? Second, try to picture the shear distance between the earth and the moon (350,000 miles more or less) and imagine being flung through space in a tiny craft, perhaps the size of your bathroom - built with 1960's technology, and ask yourself... who in their right mind would be balls to the wall crazy enough to make the trip? One tiny little thing in ten million possibilities goes wrong and there's absolutely no chance of making it back alive. What of other complications to the journey such as the Van Allen Radiation Belts? An article on space.com states that "There's a bottom line to a top-level problem associated with Van Allen Belts: The space radiation environment presents a significant impediment to both human and robotic exploration and development of space." It does not appear that the type of shielding necessary to keep astronauts safe from this radiation was present in the Apollo space craft. In fact, NASA has proposed going to the moon again, with the long term goal of establishing a permanent base there, and guess what? They estimate that it would take several feet of lead surrounded by something like 15 feet of water just to shield the radiation. Also, they would have to build the craft in space. They estimate that it would take about 10 - 20 years before we could even make an initial trip, even though we have supposedly made the trip already (in what, less than 10 years start to finish the first time?) So, just think about the advances in technology since then and ask yourself does that make sense? Why can't we achieve something in less time today, with superior technology, than we did almost 40 years ago? Finally, was there motivation to fake the moon landing? Well, what's the official story? That we were engaged in a 'space race' at the height of the cold war and that it was a matter of national pride and achievement, as well as a strong message to the communist world that we were superior? Sure, could be. After all, it certainly seems likely chums. But then again, if I were president, and it were so important to win the 'space race', I think I might put national security above actuality and maybe cut a few corners, save some money, take fewer risks; after all, you can't deny that we did have the technology to fake it, but, can anyone say for sure that we had the technology to make it?. What if the mission had been a failure and the USSR got there first? It could be a different world that we live in today for sure. But the bottom line is that I don't know, I have to be honest with myself, and it's certainly a possibility - hell you could say that it even seems probable. So, before we roll over and accept the official story, lets ask a few questions ourselves and really analyze the evidence before we criticize others for having the courage to do so. After all, and I think we can all agree on this, no one likes a sack man!

Answer 4

what a joke your knowledge is really poor.

In 1969 neil armstrong and edwin aldrin landed on the moon, there is no big deal in landing on the moon only thing required is re-entry technology, which is the same for space walks, and so far hundreds of space walks have been performed.

There is no such need to go to the moon, as information about it is already well known. It is too close and can be thoroghly studied just by telescope. It is an unnecessary risk.
Probes have already been sent to the mars and also beyond our solar system.

Answer 5

Well, actually, they DID land on the Moon. But the camera guy didn't film what was going on, and when he DID point it at the action, it was out of focus, and he ran out of film. When they got back to Earth NASA said they couldn't show what they had to the public because is didn't show the Moon AND the astronauts, or even the Earth in the background so they shot a NEW Moon landing in Hollywood. An AWESOME Moon landing where they said, "ONE SMALL STEP FOR MAN..." yadda yadda yadda

Now, if you believe even a WORD of that, I have a bridge for sale in San Francisco. You can collect a fee for crossing, and the county will do all of the maintenance. Honest!!

Answer 6

Because Americans are not FOOLS. they conducted the research and know just putting a man is not enough but colonising is impossible.
They donot spend money like in India where 10,000 crore budget is being planned for a moon mission which has no strategic or defence value.It will give some media publicity for the party in power but it is just empty bombast like our rakesh sharma circling earth in soyuz, kalpana chawla going in colombia etc.We require a dependent booster to put our satelites in orbit but we still depend on arianne.But we will go for moon mission which has no economic value.Our mental health budget for a nation of 1 billion is 198 crores and we spend 10,000 crores for moon mission when the mentallyill are roaming the streets after being abondoned.

Answer 7

I was 10 years old when it happened, and I watched as much of it as I could. I was real.There is no real reason at this time to go there, there is nothing there but dust and rocks. There may be a push at some time to put a station there, or a storage facility if we ever build a big space station or something. Like a staging area to keep building materials, so we dont have to keep bringing them from earth. But for now. they already know pretty much what is there.

Answer 8

Yes, as mention by ones that there is no economic values to go there.

Secondly, they have several missions to Mars, which is further than the moon. They have discovered sign of water on the terrain of Mars.

There is a unman Telescope sent by NASA to capture picture of the universe.

Answer 9

yes, it really did happen. I saw it on tv and in the newspaper, magazines. Why don't we go there again? good question? I think it was a big deal because the USA got there b/4 any other country. It was a big deal to do that. Maybe we don't go back again because it was really expensive. If they went back today, it would be even more expensive. That is surprising because our government is good at wasting money. You ask a really good question.

Answer 10

Yes, man really did "landed" on the moon. There is no need to go back. There is nothing there that we haven't already analyzed.

Answer 11

The moon was visited. The stuff is still there. There is no real economic incentive to go again.