what age is it ok to spank you toddler?

Answer 1

I don't believe spanking is ever necessary. However, until around age 2-3, a child has no real sense of connection to permanently attach the physical discomfort to the undesirable act. I would only use physical discipline if the situation was urgent and dangerous. I'll smack his hand if he goes to touch a hot stove or step out into the street, followed up with a firm explanation of what was wrong, but only if I have to get his full attention immediately.

I recommend the child discipline book '1-2-3 Magic'. Used properly, you'll get the disciplined child you want without ever having to lay a hand on him/her.

Answer 2

"Spanking" is not something which is age-appropriate. You could hit them from when they are 1 day old, or from 5 years old, that makes little actual difference. However, I think a better question would be "Is it okay to spank your toddler?", although from your question I can gather you have already decided that it is okay to do so.

What would spanking a child teach them? That every time they do something that the parents don't like, they are hit on the bottom? Surely, it would be more constructive to explain to the child why the action is not okay - if the child misbehaves, then he/she does not get a treat later. You tell the child that it is the child, and you are the adult. Since they are the child, they must listen to the parent. If they are compliant and well-behaved, then reward them.

I think that parenting should be positive for the child, too, and it's better to go for a rewards-based-on-good-behaiour scheme, rather than a physical-punishment-with-bad-behaviour routine. I'm sure that the majority of people would never smack a person in the street that they have never met, if that person did something similar to what a child may do - litter, yell, or be a bit bossy - so why do it to your own child?

I have a few sources here that show the 'effects' of 'spanking'. Feel free to read through them.

Answer 3

It's not. Young children need redirection. That can happen a lot of different ways, and teach them many different things. A 2-3 year old is going to want what they want. They get told no, and redirected to something else. If you leave off the redirection, you aren't teaching your child anything. Taking away what is inappropriate and showing what is, is extremely important. Discipline means teach, and people need to think about what spanking teaches. It teaches that bullying and hurting are okay in some situations. That's not right.
I would suggest reading a couple of books, Kids are worth it, by Barbara Colorosso, How to talk so kids will listen and listen so kids will talk or anything else by Faber and Mazlish. Alfie Kohn's Unconditional Parenting is good too, but it's based on studies and lots of facts and not what I'd recommend as the first one you read.

Answer 4

The criminal generic varies particularly from state to state, and the wording of that person-friendly varies very much, yet mainly a spanking that leaves 'lasting' marks is seen abusive, and 'lasting marks' is mostly seen to be redness or bruising nonetheless modern more suitable than 24 hours after the spanking become administered. straight forward experience dictates that a lot less stress must be used on youthful children than on older ones, and with a lot less ensuing marking. the most important difficulty on your question is the "appropriate to self-discipline" argument - no ascertain has any 'appropriate' to punish their children to commence with, yet each ascertain has absolutely the duty to achieve this. What we want is way more suitable father and mom living as a lot as that duty, and a lot less authorities interference with their doing so.

Answer 5

Spanking does not have an age limit on it. When you can talk to your child and see that he or she is trying to comprehend what you are saying, it's fine. Spanking a child is up to the parents of that child and no one else. All these people that think spanking is wrong, they need to think back to their own childhoods and say whether or not they got spanked. And if they aren't parents, then they just need to hush. They don't understand what it takes to raise children. Sweetie, I say go for it. You don't have to spank hard, just a pop on the diaper will startle them enough to get their attention. At this age, pain isn't a factor, you just want to get their attention so they don't keep doing wrong. I started when my kids were walking around and getting into things more. Start with a pop on the hand and if that doesn't work, spank the little butt and see if that helps.

Answer 6

It is never okay to spank a toddler or any child or any person. Spanking is a form of violence and will only teach a child that violence is an appropriate method to resolve problems. Use time outs, take away privileges, or redirect him/her.

Answer 7

DEAR IT IS OK TO SPANK A TODDLER ON THE DIAPER AND RAISE YOUR VOICE JUST A LITTLE SO THEY KNOW YOU MEAN WHAT YOU SAY AND THAT YOU MEAN BUSINESS AT THE AGE OF TWO (2) ARE THREE (3) TRUST ME IF YOU JUST KINDA POP THEM ON THE DIAPER THEY WILL CRY IT DOES NOT TAKE MUCH AT ALL OK
TAKE CARE HAPPY NEW

Answer 8

You might start out that way to get there attention I guess.I've been watching this here nanny show on abc and they do alot of time out isolation and don't talk to the kid till time out is over.They use consistency just like training a pet till they find out they aren't going to control you.

Answer 9

I'd say whenever you feel is the right time.

If they understand "no" then they should undertstand that a spanking is punishment.

Answer 10

N=E=V=E=R

idiot