What do you think of these comics?

Question

http://idrewthis.org/d/20060329.html

http://idrewthis.org/d/20040216.html

http://idrewthis.org/d/20040308.html

The links are safe, I promise. I just want to know your reaction to these comics. Do you think they have a point? If not, why? Please explain in detail. Thanks!

man from utopia, the rest of them are just as good. :)

Answer 1

I think it's supposed to be a joke at the expense of the neocons, but they're a little confusing, they kind of jump all over the place.
I agree with the part about gays having equal rights to marry, it's nobody's business but their own.

Answer 2

You can allow others to live together and marry without the government sactioning it.

Just because there are those who abuse heterosexual marriage doesn't mean that heterosexual marriage is bad.

You can accept homosexuals without accepting everything in their lifestyle.

Many of the outragouse abuses that the comics linked the above view points to where just that ... outragous. You could take any point of view and make it seem to be the same as saying something terribly wrong. Why not actually deal with that point of view. How are the above points of view wrong. No, I didn't ask how slavery is wrong. Most of the world was enlightened on that by a couple of fanatics that believed in the Bible like William Wilberforce, Abraham Lincoln, and Martin Luther King.

Answer 3

They of course have a point. They comprise some of the strongest arguments for the Gay Rights movement, put into simple to understand cartoons.

Answer 4

i think of that a sketch the place a ghost newborn is being knowledgeable by using his father could be a solid one that could enable for many puns and humorous occurrances with the characters. One character ought to take something the incorrect way and it could be hilarious... wish this facilitates...

Answer 5

"Do you think they have a point?" - yeah they bash their point in your face.
I think they are political, but not funny, so I would not normally read them. Comics are to powerful to be treated carelessly. And hopefully they are funny, to take the edge off the day. These do not - they insult the innocent majority of people, to make their 'point', in their anger against the few. Again not funny.

Answer 6

Oh, "The links are safe, I promise" just didn't do it for me. On to next question.

Answer 7

I like them. They have a point, and a good one. Blessed Be.

Answer 8

in the interest of time Ill deal with the first one

first, how is it equal rights to change the definition of marriage to suit homosexuals?
marriage is the union of a man and woman
but no, you want SPECIAL rights, that is the changing of the definition held for millennium to meet your lifestyle choice(which most consider to be perverted)
if a homosexual wants to join to another there are laws providing for that but that's not good enough, is it?

and why would you want to join a Baptist church when they teach the Word of God?

like:
1 Corinthians 6:9
Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites,
or
1 Timothy 1:9-10 knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for man slayers, 10 for fornicators, for sodomites, for kidnappers, for liars, for perjurers, and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine,

tell me, if that is what they teach and you are one, WHY DO YOU WANT TO GO THERE??

God has made it clear that your lifestyle choice is an abomination and if you choose that lifestyle over God, then be prepared to reap the consequences.

so in answer to your question, I think the cartoons are typical of sinners trying to pretend their sin isn't sin

Answer 9

They have a point. The middle one is pretty funny too.

Answer 10

They are genius. Thank you for turning me on to the site. They are very relevant.