is it worth taking a risk? should I keep being sexual w/ a condom w/ a man who is going to leave the country?

Answer 1

Assuming you're a woman, why would you want to just keep whoring yourself to a guy who's not going to be an important part of your life? Hello? I really don't get it. Is the sex THAT good? Have you asked yourself, What is this getting me? I know what it's getting him. He can go home and say, "I met an (American?) chick who was a great f---." What else can he say? That you were intelligent and sensitive and funny and he really would have liked to marry you, but--he got enough satisfaction just banging you instead? Has he noticed? Or is he too busy fitting his condom?

Final question: Do you really disrespect yourself that badly?

Answer 2

if he is not going to be in your life, then why are you taking a risk with your health and with his as well. It's a double edged sword. You put yourself in danger as well as putting him in danger. We all think our shite don't stink, but the truth is that if we are sexually active and we are not getting tested on a regular basis , using the proper necessities while having sex and this is not a committed relationship(not like any relationship has any guarantees nowadays which sucks) then why would it come to pass that you should be careless with your life when in fact your life is precisely what is at stake?? Use the condom. He's leaving the country, when and if he comes back for whatever reason, how will it bring either of you to harm to be responsible loving people to one another and wait to see if life brings you both to a place that is good to bring another life into the picture. Children deserve the absolute best we can give them. No condom, then you are asking to bring a child into this world. If you cannot take the proper care of a child then use a condom, hell use ten !!! *laughing*

Best regards to you and to yours
(just another random preson out here sharing my opinion)

Answer 3

In this instance, no it is not appropriate. There was no criminal intent by the persons responsible for printing and distributing the yearbook. Nor was there any criminal intent by anyone who received the yearbook. In fact I doubt that the majority of the students or the school community would have noticed what was in the background of one single picture, if this situation had not been blown up all out of proportion. (A picture taken at a school dance is rarely of interest to anyone who isn't either in it, or a friend or relative of someone who is in the picture.) Also, I feel there is a gross difference between pornography and a picture of two teenagers making out. Maybe the picture would be offensive to some people, but honestly, I remember seeing and reading worse in Dolly Magazine when I was a kid. (An Australian magazine, aimed at adolescent girls.) I don't know what the exact laws are in the United States, but in South Australia, the laws governing child pornography are quite harsh. The offender, regardless of their age, will have their names placed on a child sex offenders register, where they will stay for life. This prevents them from ever working with or near children, and they cannot live within 200 metres of a school or child care centre. I agree with those laws to an extent - yes, children should be protected from harm as much as possible. However, the law as it stands means that several juveniles have already been charged and their names placed on that register for sexting. This means that they are virtually unemployable once they leave school and will have a huge impact on the rest of their lives. I think that education, or in extreme cases, being charged without being entered on the child sex offenders register, would be the more appropriate response. I think that sexting is a dumb thing to do, but I don't think it's right that that person should be treated in the same manner as an adult sex offender. Finally, in the case of the yearbook, it seems that the whole thing has blown out of proportion. As I said, there was no criminal intent on behalf of anyone who received a yearbook - it was distributed as a memory of that particular year at school, not as an excuse to distribute child pornography.

Answer 4

I only saw the first half of your question... and thought the final part was going to say '....with a man that I love?'. My answer to that would have been for both of you to get sexual health tests before you have sex without a condom.

To answer your question... what has 'leaving' the country got to do with your choice of using a condom!?!?!.... Surely your not, not going to use a condom because you think it would be a ''nice going away gift!''. It won't be so nice if he gives you a 'dose' before he leaves! Would it!?!?!

Answer 5

Ummm...yes you should continue to use a condom, unless you are trying to get an STD or trying to get pregnant...or Both!!!

Answer 6

You best bet is to ALWAYS play it safe. But you have to make that call because if you want his child then do it. But remember once that child is here he may not be.

Answer 7

hi, thats an interesting question! lol! 20/F wondering the same thing... holla back

Answer 8

if you are really in to him and want to then there shouldnt be a problem...just be extra carefull but if you can wait and its not necesssary then i would say no

Answer 9

where is the risk?? that you will become tooo attached to him?? how long is he going?? does he want you to come with him?? do you want to go with him???

Answer 10

If you want his baby, then no.