What are some reasons that evolution scares the be-Jesus out of the Christians and not the other religions?

Question

Is it just that people from Christian countries have more spare time to care about something that’s only relevance to modern society is that it may prove an ancient, primitive, completely implausible belief false?

Answer 1

Most Christians accept evolution.

It's the just those who consider the Bible to be historically and scientifically accurate (the wing-nuts) who don't.

There are extremist Muslims who also reject evolution.

And some Aboriginal Australians reject the idea that they migrated there, rather than originating there.

In other words, it's not only (some) Christians who reject the findings of science.

Answer 2

That's a very interesting observation and if it's true then what does that say about the theory of evolution? Could it be that it follows the course of all the other ways that man has invented to justify remaining in sin, in other words, all of the other forms of rebellion man has come up with to keep from obeying God?

Answer 3

Because other religions have accepted that their creation myths are just that, myths, and have adapted their teachings to reflect reality, and the continuous updating of knowledge that is science. I don't understand why christians refuse to accept reality, for the truth of evolution, and the formation of the universe is much more beautiful and amazing than just saying "it magicked into being".

Answer 4

Because this Religion of Evolution is making science God.

This cult of egoist are worshiping self.

It's not fear but concern for all that buy into this fallacy.

This belief takes considerable faith, exponentially more faith than believing in God the creator.

Wayne Murray

Answer 5

Academics viewing the universe through a narrow scope should rethink assumptions
Dallas Morning News
By Roy Abraham Varghese
December 15, 2004

Last week, The Associated Press broke the news that the most famous atheist in the academic world over the last half-century, Professor Antony Flew of England's University of Reading, now accepts the existence of God.
Mr. Flew's best-known plaint for atheism, "Theology and Falsification," was delivered in 1950 to the Socratic Club, chaired by none other than C.S. Lewis. This paper went on to become the most widely reprinted philosophical publication of the last five decades and set the agenda for modern atheism.
Now, in a remarkable reversal, Mr. Flew holds that the universe was brought into being by an infinite intelligence.
"What I think the DNA material has done is show that intelligence must have been involved in getting these extraordinarily diverse elements together," he said. "The enormous complexity by which the results were achieved look to me like the work of intelligence."
Given the conventional wisdom of some psychologists that people rarely, if ever, change their worldview after the age of 30, this radical new position adopted by an 81-year-old thinker may seem startling.
But Mr. Flew's change was consistent with his career-long principle of following the evidence where it led him. And his newfound theism is the product neither of a Damascus road experience nor of fresh philosophical arguments, but by his sustained analysis of scientific data.
Mr. Flew's conclusion is consistent with the actual beliefs of most modern scientific pioneers, from Albert Einstein to quantum physicists like Max Planck and Werner Heisenberg. In their view, the intelligence of the universe - its laws - points to an intelligence that has no limitation - "a superior mind," as Einstein put it.
Not a few of our men and women of letters, it would seem, have been looking for God in all the wrong places. Those who dismiss God as a product of psychological conditioning or pre-scientific myth-making have not come to terms with the essential assumptions underlying the scientific enterprise.
Science assumes that the universe follows laws, which leads to the question of how the laws of nature came into being. How does the electron know what to do? In A Brief History of Time, Stephen Hawking asks what breathes fire into the equations of science and gives a universe for them to describe. The answer to the question of why the universe exists, he concluded, would reveal to us "the mind of God."
Last May, I helped organize a New York University symposium on religion and science, with the participation of Mr. Flew and others. Our starting point was science's new knowledge that the universe's history is a story of quantum leaps of intelligence, the sudden yet systematic appearance of intrinsically intelligent systems arranged in an ascending order.
Many people assume that the intelligence in the universe somehow evolved out of nonintelligence, given chance and enough time, and in the case of living beings, through natural selection and random mutation. But even in the most hardheadedly materialistic scenario, intelligence and intelligent systems come fully formed from day one.
Matter came with all its ingenious, mathematically precise laws from the time it first appeared. Life came fully formed with the incredibly intelligent symbol processing of DNA, the astonishing phenomenon of protein-folding and the marvel of replication from its very first appearance. Language, the incarnation of conceptual thought with its inexplicable structure of syntax, symbols and semantics, appeared out of the blue, again with its essential infrastructure as is from day one.
The evidence we have shows unmistakably that there was no progressive, gradual evolution of nonintelligence into intelligence in any of the fundamental categories of energy, life or mind. Each one of the three had intrinsically intelligent structures from the time each first appeared. Each, it would seem, proceeds from an infinitely intelligent mind in a precise sequence.
We can, if we want, declare that there is no reason why there are reasonable laws, no explanation for the fact there are explanations, no logic underlying logical processes. But this is manifestly not the conclusion adopted by Einstein, Heisenberg and, most recently, Antony Flew.
Roy Abraham Varghese of Garland is the author of The Wonder of the World: A Journey from Modern Science to the Mind of God (Tyr Publishing). He helped organize presentations by Antony Flew in Dallas on two occasions. Readers may contact Mr. Varghese through tyrpublishing.com.

Answer 6

Oh my goodness some people are saying that nothing exploded and that's how we got here! WHAT ARE WE GONNA DOOOOO?
Laugh.
Seriously Christianity was scared by evolution and so they accepted it. The real fraidy cats are the one who try to put it in the Bible. Not the ones who stand up to it.

Answer 7

I'm an evolutionist, but most of my friends are Christians. I have never detected any sign of fear of evolution in any of them, they just don't believe the scientific explaination. Just as I have no fear of religion. I just don't believe it.

Answer 8

Evolution doesn't scare me, because I know it's a hoax, and a religion to boot.

Answer 9

Evolution doesn't scare Christians. We just don't believe the nonsense, that everything evolved from one cell.

Its true that Atheist evolved from Monkeys though. Which explains a lot.

Answer 10

trust me dear, evolution in no way scares a Christian as we're not moved by non-sense. The saying "These colors don't run" was derived from Christianity.