You also know that the builder used tools and various materials to build this building.
The builder didn't just "speak"/"think" the building into existence did she?
Please share your opinions on the subject whatever they may be.
2007-01-21 09:24:58 · 12 answers · asked by Myaloo 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I love your veiw on this Doug
2007-01-21 09:30:06 · update #1
this is an odd mix of Midge's question and my previous question,sorry for the confusion
2007-01-21 09:31:46 · update #2
This is the old "creation must have a creator" argument. It's getting pretty old. But it's fun to watch the semantic masterbation.
If you can accept that "god" had no creator, then you can accept that the universe had no creator. QED
2007-01-21 09:30:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Buildings have builders. Builders use tools.
Atoms don't have builders. The tool sets to build them would be too small to use, and no-one's figured out what to make them out of. Cells are made of atoms, so if no-one built the atoms, we mustn't have any cells. I guess that buildings are made of materials, and materials are made of atoms, so since there are no atoms because there are no tools to make them with, nothing really exists.
Hmmm let's continue with obfuscated illogic and sleep-depravation enhanced thinking capabilities....
If there aren't any atoms, there can't be any reeds, skins or paper or ink. If that's the case, there can't be any Bibles. Better yet.... no Christians!
2007-01-21 17:31:44 · answer #2 · answered by Deirdre H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The creation evolution debate is not a debate on whether or not there was a builder, but who was the builder.
God or nothing.
Just look at the awesome power of nothing!
It can explode!
2007-01-21 17:32:50 · answer #3 · answered by JumpingJoy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The building is proof of the builder. Just like creation is proof of a creator.
The probability that 1 planet exist in our universe to support life is 1 in a billion trillion.
2007-01-21 17:31:00 · answer #4 · answered by ۞ JønaŦhan ۞ 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Uh, by definition, a building is something that was built.
Thus, when I see a man-made object, I know that someone made it.
This is what distinguishes man-made things from naturally-occurring things.
2007-01-21 20:00:47 · answer #5 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yawn
2007-01-21 17:33:03 · answer #6 · answered by crista 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why are limited minded humans still comparing man to God? I have told them over and over that the abilities or lack of in man does not limit or compare in any way to God.
2007-01-21 17:31:18 · answer #7 · answered by Heaven's Messenger 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
First, I will be perfectly clear in this, . . . . GOD is a HE, not a she. OK ? Understand ??
Secondly, God was not of this earth. He was ablel to speak things into existence, however we are of this earth and being that we are, we are limited to what this earth has. We do not have the POWER that GOD has. We are indeed liminted to what we have here. Yes, HE did put these limits in place or we would try to call ourselves GOD's.
So be very careful how you approach issues like this. AS I said earlier in another forum, GOD is NOT mocked. !! Read Galatians. !!
2007-01-21 17:32:46 · answer #8 · answered by having fun 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
When I look at a tree, I don't necessarily have to think there was a tree-builder.
2007-01-21 17:28:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
All this does is build my faith:
It amazes me that the God of the universe can create it without any tools and still love me uncondtionally.
God Bless.
2007-01-21 17:28:46 · answer #10 · answered by Doug 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋