English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.pittchron.com/topstories.cfm?fullStory=true&articleID=1366

How much more is going to prove the Bible to be true before people believe.

2007-01-21 09:08:43 · 8 answers · asked by Max50 7 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

8 answers

Everyone will know the Bible is true so or later.
My prayer is more know now before it is to late.

2007-01-21 13:14:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually, the Exodus has pretty much been thoroughly disproven already. And that article contains a blatent lie -- The Egyptians kept even *MORE* detailed records of their military defeats than their victories. We know to the HORSE how many horses were lost when the Hitites invaded Egypt, and to the cart and to the man. We know less of their victory over the Hitites many years later because the writers were celebrating the victory, and not keeping an objective record.

Pity you can't find one reputable source for the Exodus... or spell it.

-----

Also, I noticed that this article presents the Sea of Reeds theory as opposed to the Bible saying they crossed the Red Sea. Considering the Sea of Reeds can be crossed by foot at any low tide, or any time with a reasonably stiff wind (not necessarily a gale, just firm. 25 MPH or so), they really are peeing on their own feet... not much of a miracle to walk across a bit of land that any person to this day could go walk across any time but high tide.

2007-01-21 17:14:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

All the evidence points to it having happened. Even the egyptians have records of it. The thing is their records say it happend earlier than is normally accepted. The Egyptian recordd say it was something lie 250 years before when more people think it happend. Ramses was not the pharoh of the exodus. The problem Egyptologists refuse to change their views. A 50 year discrepancy can be dealth with bot not one 5 times that large. But they have found records of all ten of the plagues AND of the eplple leaving. They have even found inscriptions with the name of Moses in Egyptian from the same time period.

2007-01-21 17:20:47 · answer #3 · answered by kveldulf_gondlir 6 · 0 0

Did you actually read this article? All it shows is that a place mentioned in Exodus probably existed. How does that prove the Exodus is true? It takes TWO WEEKS to get across that desert. In 40 years one can literally walk completely around the earth more than once (if it were all land)

2007-01-21 17:19:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

According to Finkelstein and Silberman in "The Bible Unearthed," there is very little archaeological evidence to support the claims put forth in Exodus.

2007-01-21 17:14:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What proofs? Locations, races and wars? You could find all that in a fictional story about WWII but it would still be fiction. You would think that as anal as the Egyptians were about writing everything down that we would find something about it in their writings...I mean all the slaves leaving at once would HAVE to be a big deal...

2007-01-21 17:13:38 · answer #6 · answered by nuthnbettr2do0128 5 · 1 0

the bible is the past , present and future

2007-01-21 17:16:37 · answer #7 · answered by sunflare63 7 · 0 1

Yep.

2007-01-21 17:12:23 · answer #8 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers