English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Boudicca’s Revolt 60 AD. A warrior queen, treated barbarically by the Roman army that have come to impose Roman civlisation, leads a revolt that may just reclaim Britain for the Britons.

2007-01-21 07:39:44 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

++BROTHER CAN YOU SPARE ME A BA OR AT LEAST A NICE STAR?

2007-01-21 08:06:45 · update #1

I knew that. Eveybody knows that. But lie McMurphy said, "At least I tried god damn it!" What the hell have you done, couch potato? Just smart enough to be dangerous aren't you you danged cynical, sour uncreative downer? But God go with you and bless you and show you a better way. Peace and hand loose dude. apco;cfy uopKi

2007-01-21 09:34:30 · update #2

+++ Could really use a best anwser right now my friend. I tried to help?

2007-01-21 09:36:35 · update #3

9 answers

The uprising you are speaking of was a terrible defeat to Boudicca and her people.

Hillary Clinton does seem to be similarly brave, but she seems to have alot more on her side than the early Britons did when they came up against Rome.

For example, more people vote for Democrats in the U.S. than vote for Republicans. Americans just threw a bunch of Republcans out of office because of Bush policy in Iraq.

It doesn't look like Bus will ever get out of Iraq, so that's good news for Hillary.

Your connection to history is interesting, but not completely accurate. Good question.

2007-01-21 07:46:28 · answer #1 · answered by Marc Miami 4 · 1 0

I love this question! Because in studying the period in which Elizabeth I ruled, there were many concerns if she, a woman, could handle it. As we all know, Elizabeth's I's reign delivered some of the most prosperous and peaceful times that gave us some beautiful history, wonderful literature - England flourished under Elizabeth, I suspect that Hillary would do just as good, if not better, than Elizabeth.

2016-03-29 07:51:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Boudicca was a strong honorable women that was even admired by her enemies.

Hillary is a conniving, power-hungry puppet master.

Not anything alike.

2007-01-21 07:47:34 · answer #3 · answered by Sage Bluestorm 6 · 1 1

Really Slick? I haven't seen her swing a sword yet. I use a katana myself. I'm up for a match with her anytime Hon.

2007-01-21 08:01:27 · answer #4 · answered by Erica R 4 · 1 0

Ugh.

I don't know how you could even compare Hillary to Boudicca!

2007-01-21 07:44:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

HA! I have that program on, too. I hope she wins!

If Hilary could pull off that kind of stuff... I'd be amazed.

2007-01-21 07:43:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

She seems more like a warrior comrade, the likes of Stalin.

2007-01-21 07:44:32 · answer #7 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 1 2

Hmmm....

Really?

2007-01-21 07:49:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

good for her

2007-01-21 07:45:15 · answer #9 · answered by icheeknows 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers