2007-01-21 04:51:56 · 22 answers · asked by soulsista 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hello soulsista.. :)
Not all things..because Science cannot prove a Miracle..
Because it defies the Laws of Nature..
But, yet they cannot disprove it either, because there is evidence to the contrary.. :)
In Jesus Most Precious Name..
With Love..In Christ.. :)
2007-01-21 05:00:52 · answer #1 · answered by EyeLovesJesus 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Proving negatives beyond reasonable doubt is very difficult, for any branch of science or logic.
But science is about creating new hypotheses and finding ways to test them. And believe me, if the existence of 'God' could be proven scientifically, it would have been done by now. Imagine the bragging rights to that one. ;-)
2007-01-21 13:09:04 · answer #2 · answered by The angels have the phone box. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely NOT! Sometimes the arrogance of science and religion is acute. Granted, mankind is the smartest species on this Earth, but when compared to Universal Knowledge, Earthlings are still in the womb in the first stage of growth.
2007-01-21 13:08:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can prove that something doesn't exist by USING science and logic and philosophy, religions, archaeology, anthropology, ethics, psychology, you name it. So far a creator god cannot be proven using any of those means, but can be disproven by using those same means and more. When you're all caught up with the above and toss in Buddhist and Eastern philosophy, meet me on the debate grounds.
_()_
2007-01-21 12:57:14 · answer #4 · answered by vinslave 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Just because you can't prove thru science or logical that something exists, it doesn't mean it is not real. Faith that it does exist is a very big part of the belief of existence.
2007-01-21 13:03:25 · answer #5 · answered by Terry Z 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No - many things, like itches, love, anger, the perception of the color red, thought, etc. are all quite real, but non-measurable by instruments which is the ridiculously inadequate standard for acknowledgement by science.
2007-01-21 12:57:06 · answer #6 · answered by All hat 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not necessarily. But I wouldn't advise you or anyone else to try to convince people that this non-proven thing does exist. You can't blame anyone for not believing an unproven thing exists. If it exists in your heart, then it exists for you. It may not exist to everyone.
Blessed Be.
2007-01-21 12:58:43 · answer #7 · answered by Maria Isabel 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No the scientific and logical view would be that its existence would be in question until valid evidence was produced to prove otherwise.
2007-01-21 12:54:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Okay think of it this way. Bertrand Russel once came up with the argument of the orbiting teapot. He said that there is a teapot orbiting Mars. None of us can see that teapot orbiting Mars but it's there. Same thing with God. There is a God, for whom there is no solid evidence whatsoever, but he is there. Do you honestly think it is possible there is a teapot around Mars? Same with God.
2007-01-21 12:59:19 · answer #9 · answered by Dido 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, it's a matter of faith. If you want a scientifiic answer try another section.
But if you want a spiritual one, it's a matter of faith and that cannot be measured with cups and cannot be quantified with through facts, only beleifs in something that cannot be seen.
2007-01-21 12:59:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋