it turns out I am transporting a hive of bees, would it be illegal not to warn them?
2007-01-21 04:41:43 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
hahaha well you warned them not to look !!! just dont be too surprised if they forget to warn you about the beating you will recieve!! hahaha no but seriously dont try it!!
2007-01-21 04:50:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
You could try wording that a bit differently, as in, "Officer, I'm transporting a bee hive, with thousands of bees in it. I have no problem with your opening the trunk, but you should do so safely, and that means that you don protective gear and use a smoke injector to contorl them." Assuming, of course, that that's the truth.
2007-01-21 04:52:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's not illegal,
1. They can't search it anyway without PC.
2. If they have grounds to search (ie it's in your girlfriend's name and she gives permission), then you should verbalize why you don't think they should - ie a hive of bees. I'm deathly allergic to bees. One sting stops my breathing. Even with a kit with a needle, a swarm would kill me in a matter of minutes.
If you don't like 'cops' that's one thing, but do you want to potentially be responsible for their deaths, and have the families be without a mother or father because you wanted to play a game with them?
2007-01-21 05:15:12 · answer #3 · answered by HG 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, they have every right to search you. The comment "you dont want to look in the truck" raises suspicion and being that you were pulled over in the first place gives them "Search Incidental To Lawful Arrest" and a summons is simple a summons in leiu of arrest so, yes they can search your trunk and yes you could be charged with reckless endangerment.
2007-01-21 06:01:22 · answer #4 · answered by zebj25 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It relies upon on the enterprise and state..... even even with the undeniable fact that each and every site visitors give up will ensue on a officer's unit historic past, it shows up purely in that one place - and it would not ensue for different officers on your comparable jurisdiction. considering warnings do no longer bypass previous the community enterprise, you haven't any longer something to fret approximately - in spite of in case you had previous tickets. Calif Deputy.
2016-12-14 08:30:09 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it is called reckless endangerment; which is basically knowingly engaging in activity that is likely to create a risk of physical injury.
You would also be charged with felony stupidity. Of course the majority of your sentence would be served in the prison hospital where you would be convalescing from a world class beating. Make sure you tape the confrontation, it's always funny to see a smart a** tough guy beg for mercy.
2007-01-21 05:23:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Just because you say you don't want to look in the trunk, the cops would still not have probable cause to open it. They would have to ask you if they could.
I suppose before they opened it they would ask you if there is anything in there that can hurt them, and if you said no you would probably get in trouble.
2007-01-21 05:08:45 · answer #7 · answered by greencoke 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No it's not illegal not to tell them. Just commen curtousy you should tell them what is in the trunk before it's opened. What if they are allergic to stings, then you just opened a new can of worms.
2007-01-21 04:49:49 · answer #8 · answered by sandy 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Legal or illegal is not the point. It is just humanness that you should warn them.
2007-01-21 04:47:08 · answer #9 · answered by Kool-kat 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
You should warn them just out of sheer human compassion. Then you will not have to harbor too much guilt over it when they dont believe you.
2007-01-21 04:50:55 · answer #10 · answered by CHEVICK_1776 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋