What has the United States done in order to fix the conflict in Darfur?

Question

i already know they sent in 17,300 troops but what else was done??

Answer 1

The United Nations have the problem in their sights, as they have for years.

Answer 2

Nothing because they are too worried about spreading URANIUM all over Afghanistan, Iraq and soon Iran and destroying the whole middle east and killing their own troops who fire this stuff. They like genocide thats why Darfur goes on.

Answer 3

For one the Bush administration needs to quite helping the
leader of Darfur. Quite giving them money and arms. Tell them
to change what they are doing to there people.

Answer 4

no longer as long as we are slowed down in Iraq and Afghanistan.Monetarily it relatively is annoying to do top now too,with billions going in direction of the conflict,and the economy rigidity we've at residing house.Obama has his artwork decrease out.I in basic terms wish the yankee human beings do no longer assume miracles from him the 1st few years in workplace.once you get in a wreak like george have been given us in,it takes awhile for the physique men to place the areas back in place.

Answer 5

17,300 troops is more than enough considering how little
is our national interest in the region & conflict...

Answer 6

There is not much they can do.The Somali government opposes US or UN troops there.The best thing is to give money to the UN food program

Answer 7

What has anyone else done, for instance the UN? Nothing, nada, zilch. What do you propose?

Answer 8

Hold on....

The WORLD frickin' loses their mind because of "US influence in the world" and rejects EVERYTHING WE DO.

We offer up 17,000 soldiers and you want to know WHAT ELSE we're going to do?

I tell you what we're going to do...

Watch the FRENCH frickin' do something for once!

Answer 9

I think US is heading Death Valley all together again...as long as Bush is not sending his kids...

Answer 10

Whatever it is, the Democrats and the U.N. will say it is wrong.