http://usawakeup.org/HowToDestroyAmerica.htm
Watch this one too,it will make you feel the same way.I saw your link when you posted it awhile back.Very sobering and very worth the watch.Dar covered it very well .Thanks for posting it...
2007-01-21 04:08:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Yakuza 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is scarey but it's exactly what I see going on. We had 3 schools when I grew up here. We now have 15 elementary, 5 Jr. High and 2 more being built, 3 Highschools and 3 more being built. This growth has happened in 15 years. It grew some before then but the majority has been recent. It's sick to see what's happening especially since this was farm country. My town was called a "village" and wasn't big enough to warrent a spot on the map. Now we're more less a suburb of Chicago. One giant concrete jungle to the lake. Solid traffic 24/7. There isn't a down time. It's not good. More isn't merrier. We're in a path and an area where the Canadian geese come. I love them myself. But too many don't want them in their yard so people poison them. I don't care if some nit wit thinks there's a patch of grass so therefore we can squeeze a few more in.....it destroys any quality of life. I used to be people person......but I'm beginning to feel very claustrophobic.
2007-01-21 13:10:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Homer J. Simpson you are a genius. Well at least you know basic mathematics. Logarithmic is not even close to exponential. It is like saying that multiplication is the same as summation.
The video purports the sky is falling methodology. It is fear mongering for the mathematically challenged and for those that have never seen a graph. The methods used in the presentation amount to no more than cheap tricks available to anyone with basic statistics. Mathematically it is devious.
2007-01-21 15:02:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by iLLegal Mexican 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I've seen it and everybody needs to see it. What is sad is that he was hoping that his worst case would have our population at 300,000,000 in 2020 - not 2006. Of course, he was only talking about LEGAL immigrants, and illegal immigrants and THEIR chain migration through their children make it logarithmically worse.
The lifeboat has long since begun to founder but the rich/poor divide growing greater means it is something our no longer representative elite don't see. It hits schools, but if you and yours are in private schools, you don't see it. If you are wealthy and not bound to PPO bare bones health coverage or high deductible health insurance for even healthy children, you don't see it. For a while, only our poor saw it through job/wage destruction, but the jobs they are taking are middle class jobs now, and the services are no longer 'impacted' but being ruined so that middle class see it.
I don't think the wealthy in the US really want to live behind armed security guarded walls and be unable to walk freely on the streets with their families as is common in countries where there is only rich and poor. However, they are baffled as to the impact because they are buffered, still.
Unfortunately, by the time they figure it out, it will be too late for the country, so we need representatives that understand the issue. Even if they don't package as slick and pretty as the globalists.
--
Homer, logarithmic growth has long since become idiomatic. However, mathematically you are correct that the word would be exponentially.
When you start paying me for my insight I may start being more anal over my diction (not grammar). Maybe.
2007-01-21 12:00:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by DAR 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
There are some obvious problems with 'the numbers'. First, the red part of the graph represents immigrants and their offspring. Well, so does the green part of the graph. The majority of the people who are represented in red, are Americans born in America. Only a fraction of them are actually immigrants.
If those people are supported in their efforts to live, become educated and work in the U.S., then those efforts will pay for the additional infrastructure that's required. Those immigrants and their offspring will pay their own way, just as all citizens of the United States pay their own way.
I do agree that there needs to be a great deal more emphasis put on helping third-world nations to become self-sufficient. None of the first world nations can handle the entire demand for immigration that poverty, war, disease, corruption etc... creates.
But we can make it more tolerable, partly through liberal immigration policies facilitated by built-in social supports (which benefit the country in the long-term), and partly by a global and multi-pronged effort to help third-world countries to raise their standards of living.
In part, this means that countries like the U.S., Canada, England, China, and others.... need to develop economic, social and foreign policies that are less self-serving, economically, and more responsive and responsible to conditions globally.
2007-01-21 12:24:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
That video is another Race Supremacy Propaganda Production:
Dark-skinned immigrants loitering on street corners. A dark-skinned immigrant running from a pursuing police car.
Those are just two of the racially charged images flashing across TV screens this election season in a big-money campaign by anti-immigration groups.
The objective: steer voters away from Republicans and Democrats who support guest-worker programs and other immigration reforms, including those proposed by President George W. Bush.
The ads were placed on the air by the Coalition for the Future of the American Worker, a front group for radical anti-immigration groups including the nation's largest and wealthiest, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).
(These groups' ties run deep. The head of FAIR, Dan Stein, is president of the Coalition. The Coalition's spokesperson is Roy Beck, head of another anti-immigration group created by the founder of FAIR.)
And . . .
NumbersUSA hosted an afternoon open house at its plush new digs, where the lobbyists relaxed, nibbled on catered food, and conversed with the leaders and other officials of key anti-immigration organizations.
Patrick McHugh of the Washington-based Center for Immigration Studies, which purports to be a squeaky clean think tank that rejects racism, was there pressing the flesh along with Barbara Coe, head of the California Coalition for Immigration Reform, who repeatedly referred to Mexicans — as she has for years — as "savages."
The Citizens Informer, a “White Supremacist” tabloid put out by the Council of Conservative Citizens hate group, was available at the open house.
NumbersUSA executive director Roy Beck, a long-time friend of Coe's, adopted a more moderate tone when he addressed his guests and told them what they should be doing to end the current immigration regime.
It would be better, Beck counseled, if their attempts to lobby legislators that week did not appear to be orchestrated by NumbersUSA. For their campaign to be effective, he said, it "needs to look like a grassroots effort."
And . . .
Beck makes a statement on his web site that NumbersUSA is not intended to bash immigrants or have racial overtones. Still, his group supports the Federation for American Immigration Reform and the American Immigration Control Foundation in their immigrant-bashing billboard campaign.
Beck also is the Washington editor of The Social Contract, a quarterly journal that has published articles by "White Nationalists" like Samuel Francis (RIP), who was fired from the conservative Washington Times after writing a racially inflammatory column, and James Lubinskas, a contributing editor for the racist American Renaissance magazine.
Beck's web site includes an extensive listing of other anti-immigration groups.
**In other words, Beck and his rabble at NumbersUSA are traitorous Race Supremacists. Following this scum will lead you to jail, or worse - a trailer park.
2007-01-21 13:33:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by EMS 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
I've seen it already
but it is America's fault, since they only want to bring low skilled labor, why not bring highly skilled people who would benefit the economy? Just like Canada !!
C'mon there are a hell of jobs in the U.S.!! and there is room for everybody, I lived there!!!
2007-01-21 12:54:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Masiosare 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have seen it before.It apears to me that Dar had all the answers that I would have given. Thank you Dar.
2007-01-21 12:36:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by I'm Jerry 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well put. NumbersUSA has earned a bookmark on my browser.
2007-01-21 12:01:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by trentrockport 5
·
2⤊
0⤋