Additionally, is Cunnlingus permissible, how about Analingus. Given Leviticus 18:22 and 1 Corinthians 6:9, what is your interpretation of these bedchamber activities?
2007-01-21 01:37:03 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Leviticu 18:22 most properly translated should be:
"And with a male you shall not lay [in the] lyings of a woman."
That is, two men must not engage in sexual behavior on a woman's bed. Presumably, they must go elsewhere to have sex; a woman's bed was sacred and was to be reserved for heterosexual sex. (may also have been aimed at male homo-sexual sex should not be done in pagan temples)
1 Corinthians 6:9 seems to me to refer to men (Malakoi) who are lazy, indolent and care nothing for the struggle that Paul was wanting from his new Christians.
"Arsenokoitai" refers more to male temple prostitutes. Again, not likely to be ardent converters of anyone.
Funny how some Christians use these two verses to condemn their own children who find themselves attracted to the same gender.
I see nothing in either verse to outlaw any sexual behavior besides giving money to folks of non-Christian leanings and worshipping in pagan temples.
Now about wearing clothing of blended fibre and eating shrimp... oh, we can just go stone those folks. Right?
2007-01-21 02:00:04 · answer #1 · answered by NeoArt 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Revelation 17:5
2007-01-21 01:42:23 · answer #2 · answered by Invisible_Flags 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In the state of marriage it is proper and right for both spouses to experience the pleasure of the gift of sex,but as for licking each others private recesses that seems to be the role of animal behavior.
2007-01-21 01:44:29 · answer #3 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Cloitus
2016-10-16 09:13:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋