English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

Non-Aligned Movement or NAM was established during the cold war period. It is an organization of countries (mostly third world) which consider themselves, not formally aligned with any military group (i.e. the US block or the Soviet camp). Although cold war ended in the early 90's with the disintegration of the Soviet Union, thus nullifying Warsaw pact, US military block (North Atlantic Treaty Organization or NATO), is still alive and kicking. The most recent being active participation of NATO member countries with the US in it's war against terror in Afghanistan and Iraq. Since, there's no other country or military block left in the present world scenario to counter the US (being the sole super power) and its military allies, it could now be rightly said that NAM has lost it's relevance.

2007-01-21 01:31:42 · answer #1 · answered by Sanjay K 3 · 0 0

NAM had no relevance even during its hey-day. The member nations, although intended to remain aloof from the US and USSR blocks, were indeed aligned to either of the blocks. The US considered India as aligned to USSR. That was true also. During the Bangladesh War, India banked upon the support of USSR and USA took a pronouncedly anti-India stand in the imbroglio. At the present juncture, there is absolutely no need for NAM and any reason that may invented for its revival would only be humbug.

2007-01-23 19:59:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Considering the objectives of the NAM, as we all know,is still relevant today and the countries which are not members of this movement must also be persuaded to join to make this only world of ours free from wars of any sort and thus preventing the peace process from deteriorating further. NAM Summits should strongly pass resolutions that can be worked out at the basic level. Simply incorporating the objectives of the NAM in the syllabus of education (children don't even understand the purpose of it) is not going to help in any way.It should be scrupulously followed and show us the way so that the future generation understand the purpose of NAM or lose its relevance.

2007-01-21 01:03:19 · answer #3 · answered by katragadda 1 · 1 0

With collapse of Soviet Union, NAM has ceased to be relevant.NAM in its heydays of Nehru, Sukarno, Tito and Nasser could proclaim " independence " either from Soviet Union or America and still maintain cordial relations with these two super powers.Now there are no super powers ! Yes, even the US of A can not claim to be a super power any longer.Listen to the language, head of Venezuelan government [ Hugo Chavez] uses against them ! In fact countries like China and India are in the process of becoming economic super powers.So will be the countries like Russia and Brasil.Military power of the nation states is now being replaced with economic power of the communities of small and big nations.This has resulted in eliminating the so called military power blocks of early 20th century.So good bye NAM !

2007-01-23 05:13:11 · answer #4 · answered by Jitendra 1 · 0 0

still relevent because third worldcountries need to solve many problems like hunger, malnutrition, unemployment,terrorism etc. within their countries and exploitation by rich countries reguarding their natural resources from out side.NAM can only a solution to check the anybody's monopoly. if UNO has failed to fulfill the aspirations of majority people in the world, NAM can do this duty by acting a world parliament to discuss various problems. its going to become a WORLD DIAS.

2007-01-21 17:02:07 · answer #5 · answered by saago 1 · 0 0

extraordinarily much all strikes encompass compatible persons who agree, a minimum of in concept, with the ideology of mentioned circulation. maximum strikes are an emotional reaction to perceived wrongs which the comparable hopes to splendid or counter. regrettably, this in many situations finally leads to a single extremist acceptable being fought (emotionally, bodily, and so on.) by skill of yet another the two extremist or radical acceptable with neither team determining the magnitude of working for the mutual sturdy of one and all, helping the meant rights of the two facet on a similar time as awareness the commonality of all. whether lots of those in touch in such, whether or no longer they be male or woman, could be gifted and correctly comprehend that it extremely is greater political and social power in communities than on a man or woman foundation, intelligence will become suspect. Be properly. Addition: This ones chum, Joanie, there's no "thesis", yet an trouble-free fact of glaring fact. Such is the character of strikes from a historic and sociological attitude. That greater could desire to be completed by skill of working to assist and sell the rights of all is easy trouble-free experience and the comparable has in many situations been expressed by skill of such persons as Ghandi and His Holiness, the 14th Dalai Lama, Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. , and so on. whilst persons the two with conscious or subconscious strikes fail to comprehend and stay the comparable, branch, disharmony, disunity, worry and hatred carry on with. historic previous keeps for example the comparable. Namaste.

2016-11-25 23:49:02 · answer #6 · answered by goulette 4 · 0 0

Simple. To keep away from others action good or bad.

2007-01-21 22:57:49 · answer #7 · answered by hanvis 4 · 0 0

It is only in NAMe.

2007-01-21 02:08:43 · answer #8 · answered by mcmohan40 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers