Should someone be treated for pulmonary embolism after back surgery?

Question

I good friend of mine died from a pulmonary embolism. He had back surgery, encountered some complications about a week later, and was re-admitted to the hospital. The next day he died of a PE. He had been on his back for a few weeks and was overweight.

Answer 1

despite the known risk of blood clots after surgery, people aren't routinely given blood thinners to prevent PE because to do so would increase the risk of surgical bleeding. once the diagnosis of PE was made however, he should have been treated. PE isn't always easy to diagnose however, and in the absence of any further details I would postulate that no standards of care were violated in your friend's case.

Answer 2

Throwing a Clot From a Lower Extremity, Is of Concern, With Immobility, Perhaps he Also had a Defect In the Clotting Cascade.

Answer 3

definite, word that maximum individuals with PEs are not taken care of surgically in any respect. except there is an strangely extreme clot burden, meaning the whole lung is clotted off for some reason, it relatively is amazingly uncommon. the common medical care is a heparin drip, to dodge greater issues. If there's a extreme clot burden, intravascular tPA is now and back seen.

Answer 4

A physician cannot treat for a condition like that until it occurs and the diagnosis made.

Answer 5

Poor guy, he should have ben aware of all complications.