Whatever is not as 'part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent and fulfillment' is not what unity is.
[Whatever is not as 'part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent and fulfillment'] is not [what unity is].
[Whatever is not as X] is not [what X is].
Is this a grammatically correct statement? If not, kindly help me to correct.
2007-01-20
17:31:59
·
8 answers
·
asked by
The Knowledge Server
1
in
Society & Culture
➔ Languages