2007-01-20 17:10:43 · 12 answers · asked by STFU Dude 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yea...The theists really thought they were on to something with that theory..and to shatter their hopes and dreams like that..you are so mean.
2007-01-20 17:15:21 · answer #1 · answered by Poo 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hey, I like "irreducibly complex." You get fundys saying words with 5 syllables in them. How often does THAT happen?
2007-01-20 17:14:02 · answer #2 · answered by Black Parade Billie 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If god is by skill of definition omniscient/all-powerful, then that's by skill of extension irreducibly complicated... yet no longer interior the comparable way that the Spanish Inquisition is arguing for clever layout. greater interior the way which you would be able to neither injury nor create matter; if god encompasses each and everything, you won't be able to do away with some thing from it.
2016-11-25 23:26:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of COURSE. I mean... an ultimately powerful cosmic superbeing capable of conjuring planets and laws of nature out of oblivion then it stands to reason that this thing would be so unbelievably complex that it would be the epitome of "irreducibly complex".
2007-01-20 17:14:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
GOD is not complex, but man takes that which is made to be simple concerning GOD and turns it around to make it seem like it is complex. the only reason that men think that GOD is complex, is because they have never had that personal relationship called SALVATION yet.
2007-01-20 17:29:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, just irreducibly a hypothesis.
2007-01-20 17:15:25 · answer #6 · answered by Rosebee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in your dreams if god were so complex and of a supreme supernatural order you could not even begin to sense it because we live in the natural plane with only natural brains and senses and tools of natural means with which to measure we don't have a god yardstick for good reason.
2007-01-20 17:20:06 · answer #7 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My head hurts pondering that one.
2007-01-20 17:37:12 · answer #8 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, which proves that He did not evolve.
2007-01-20 17:16:52 · answer #9 · answered by revulayshun 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
only to the "willfully ignorant".
2007-01-20 17:17:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋