I think the sentence was little bit harsh. 10 years for tax evasion is not right.
2007-01-20 13:52:48 · 7 answers · asked by Chase 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
He would have been better off if he molested children or killed someone while driving drunk. I am not a big fan of Hovind, as he seemed to have a chip on his shoulder and was asking for them to come for him.
This is an excellent argument for a flat tax. The average American should not have to spend hours of their time and maybe hundreds of dollars figuring out what they owe their government.
A free people should not have to put up with IRS tyranny.
2007-01-20 14:36:56 · answer #1 · answered by JBD 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The amount of money he owed meant he was originally arrested and told he could go to jail for 280 years. That's a lot of back taxes.
But my favorite part was when he volunteered his parishinors to pay it for him.
2007-01-20 14:01:56 · answer #2 · answered by eri 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
...for tax evasion it is a tad harsh........for being the lying, stealing, self aggrandizing, con-artist dink that he is, 10 years sounds about right.
2007-01-20 14:00:00 · answer #3 · answered by thewolfskoll 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Its sweet to see a hypocrite like that get hard time.
2007-01-20 14:07:16 · answer #4 · answered by Michael da Man 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He's an unrepentant fraud to the core. This was the one area where his lies were illegal.
2007-01-20 13:56:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I have to pay my taxes, so should he.
.
2007-01-20 13:56:49 · answer #6 · answered by Weird Darryl 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
he shouldn't have did it
2007-01-20 13:56:41 · answer #7 · answered by glamour04111 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋