English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Will it take that long?

2007-01-20 13:07:08 · answer #1 · answered by kissmybum 4 · 0 0

If the world is still fighting for power and china still don't realise the meaning of life in the next 20-30 years, i think China will be a growing military threat.

2007-01-20 13:21:53 · answer #2 · answered by Stefan Kho 3 · 0 0

The only problem here is that yes its true china has a massive military and can kick some ***, but you see America has really ever gone a long time without being in a war so even though we may not have as much manpower we have much more experience. They have a large army thats just sitting on its *** doing nothing, while we have a somewhat smaller army fighting. the experience that we have will always make us more dominant over china.

2007-01-20 13:59:33 · answer #3 · answered by Jd 1 · 0 0

each and every military is a threat, yet whilst the U. S. have been to bypass to conflict with China, the U. S. could win. each and every physique looks to forget that in spite of in case you have an incredibly great military, it additionally will choose countless supplies to keep up the warriors. the U. S.'s military and air stress is more desirable the China's without doubt, air superiority would be won for specific. whilst the army wins the sea conflict, they are in a position to blockade supply shipments if China have been to objective and deliver supplies to its squaddies in the neighboring allied international locations. greater squaddies value greater supplies, kit, and so on.. Revo - it form of feels you do no longer understand plenty approximately air craft agencies.. In ww2 japan kamikazied the Essex agencies many many circumstances and it would not sink. those Essex agencies have been replaced continuously like 3-4 circumstances over and the U.S. is now at the instant utilising Nimitz type agencies, that are additionally at the instant deliberate to being upgraded to the Ford type agencies. the only ingredient which could definitely sink them is a nuclear bomb. in case you think of a good submarine can tackle a great service, then dam.. good success with that.

2016-12-14 07:46:10 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

That's almost a best case scenario! With the dooms day clock reset at 11:55, we sure don't have a lot of wiggle room, so if you can guarantee us thirty years of coexistence, I'm ready to call you an optimist!

If we can guarantee ourselves anything, it's that China will continue to expand militarily. China is a very patient adversary. It will never do anything too radical, it will usually leave that kind of work to it's surrogates, i.e. N.Korea! So, in the battle for supremacy, the only way to win is to stay one or two steps ahead of your closest rival. The US must stay strong in order to keep China from getting to stupid. Also, it must stop pouring money into China, this is truly the root of all evil!

2007-01-20 13:18:23 · answer #5 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 1 0

There is an excellent article in this weeks Time magazine about China becoming the next Superpower. It is happening now, not in 20-30 yrs.

2007-01-20 13:05:50 · answer #6 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 1 0

The US is a military threat to China. Therefore China is a threat to the US. Never ending violence>

2007-01-20 13:09:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In 20-30 yrs. That's funny. They are a world dominating threat right now. There are close to two billion chinese, you could give each of them a pocket knife and they could take this country easy.

2007-01-20 13:08:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

China has always been a threat to the US, but not as bad as North Korea or Iran can be, and of course rogue terrorists.

2007-01-20 13:05:30 · answer #9 · answered by cajunrescuemedic 6 · 0 0

Yes, thanks largely in part to missile weapons system technology supplied to the Communist Chinese courtesy of the DUNC and Bill Clinton, in what appears to be a pro-quo to secure election PAC-money from the Chinese. The Democrats lost the next election anyway and some of America's military missile weapons system technological advantage was diminished.

2007-01-20 13:07:34 · answer #10 · answered by Mr. US of A, Baby! 5 · 1 0

They have been a treat for quite some time

2007-01-20 13:06:12 · answer #11 · answered by Matt G 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers