Is there room for the fictitious Christian 'God' and the Mighty Emperor Penguin?
2007-01-20 12:56:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
If the two were not so diametrically opposed , that might be allowed. When you look carefully at the Bible there are no gradual processes presented, but season changes, erosion, cosmic activities that are not new, growth of plants, birth of humans and animals etc etc.--Everything in life has a pattern, blueprint, not some accident of mutation.
These processes are made very clear. As for a process of ape changing into humans--and the need for millions of years to be seen, IT HASN'T , and will continue to be found a preposterous hoax. The making of a human that hardly resembles a human in any way by a joining of 2 cells , except for its DNA --is a 9 month express package, phenomenon.
Please understand just as a father , would find it highly insulting that his son would walk around saying he was not born, but just happened, without any connection with love , purpose etc.
How much greater an insult for the rejection of God as our marvelous maker. He indeed has the right to demand appreciation but no, he indeed commands it by the superb majesty in all creation--that cannot be substituted by the silliest fairy tale in all of life
2007-01-20 21:16:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by THA 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely, yes, because they are two different subjects. Evolution theory does not deal with HOW life began, only what happened to it AFTER it began.
It's entirely possible God uses evolution as one of his tools.
2007-01-20 20:59:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Squirrley Temple 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is no such thing as true
evolution.
Creation centers around genetic
frequencies, and every wave length
is it's own frequency
The actual creation process requires
energy to interface with invisible
forces we know as Laws Of Physics.
Time and space are merely by-products
of said reaction.
2007-01-20 21:09:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by kyle.keyes 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I've said this so many times. I believe in evolution, and that it was part of God's plan.
Why is it so difficult for people to see it that way?
2007-01-20 20:58:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Holiday Magic 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Absolutely
2007-01-20 20:57:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by crista 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Saint Thomas Aquinas studied nature because he believed god was part of everything.
He came up with the theory of primary mover. if there were 2 gases that created the big bang. what moved to make them mix. It had to be some thing otherwise the gases wouldn't mix. :)
2007-01-21 00:08:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Eric E 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes of course.Evolution is a natural process.A part of nature that God included from the beginning.An animal can evolve to surive the changing condition's around it.
2007-01-20 21:04:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by flossie mae 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think so; there is so much substantial evidence for evolution, but the things that have resulted from it are so overwhelmingly complex (like the eye, BRAIN, the functioning of dna, the list goes on and onnnn); i think that there had to be some "guidance"
2007-01-20 20:59:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by hi_imamodel 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
YES! I know many people who are believers and also believe in evolution and do not interpret the Bible literally. We are not all Bible Thumpers any more than atheists are all TheoryofEvolution thumpers
2007-01-20 21:04:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by LIVINGmylife 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure. However, evolution and the Bible are a different story. Same goes for God and rationality.
2007-01-20 20:56:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋