2007-01-20 09:36:23 · 17 answers · asked by Alex A 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No. The U.S. and a handful of other world superpowers have the nukes, but also have the restraint to only use them as a last option. Far too many other radical regimes would like to use them as a first option. There's nothing wrong with owning a .44 Mag. to protect your home, but you wouldn't give one to a 3 year old or someone without the mental capacity to respect its deadly force. North Korea, Iran, and any other enemy of human rights can have "pellet guns" to play with, but the "big bores" need to be safely locked-up by the grown-ups!
2007-01-20 09:51:08 · answer #1 · answered by Answer Master Dude 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
while i dont think that there should be any weapons of mass destruction, we, the united states, cannot prevent other countries from doing it if we are too
we also need to stop making them because the ones we have could blow up the whole world like 100 times over
2007-01-20 17:46:45 · answer #2 · answered by xoooooooo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but it is too late to turn back now, no one will make the first step to stop it, and now China is playing the power game, they have all the money they need now the stupid West gave it to them and are continuing to do so, not to worry another 50 years and there won't be a lot left to fight over
2007-01-20 18:01:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hi you know as well as i do that the govrnments use the excuse that it is potecting our interest of world peace that we have these weapons this is hogwash what is the saying only the strong survive and to the decrement of the nationals below the government the politicians will survive
2007-01-20 17:51:41 · answer #4 · answered by Ken M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
just the USA use to build this kind of weapons and the worst thing, they have used it against innocent people. do you remember Hiroshima??
2007-01-20 17:58:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
By the sounds of it only bush is allowed he has to have the biggest or he will throw his toys out the pram again
2007-01-23 10:52:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
With the resources and knowledge yes.
In fact you can probably do it yourself without being a country.
2007-01-20 18:09:27 · answer #7 · answered by Reg 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on where you are living. If I lived in Iran, I would want nuclear weapons. M.A.D. mutually assured destruction.
2007-01-20 17:45:23 · answer #8 · answered by slack action 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Clearly, no one should have them.
But If one country has them then it is very difficult to argue why others shouldn't.
2007-01-20 22:24:12 · answer #9 · answered by BigAl 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see why not. Some foreign country is just going to blow us up anyway, so why not get it over with.
$10 bucks on Russia.
2007-01-20 17:45:58 · answer #10 · answered by Funny Bun 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋