2007-01-20 01:05:03 · 6 answers · asked by falcidia 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Different points of view,but very clever answers.
To W W D: would you try to ANSWER or prefer playing teacher?
2007-01-20 06:07:45 · update #1
Iran doesn't need to worry about the "troops in Iran", but the jets in Israel. The United States in Iraq is an excellent buffer against Iran retaliating against Israel for bombing it's nuclear sites.
In other words, Israel with do the deed, and if Iran attacks Israel, it will be opening a great big can of trouble.
2007-01-20 01:11:43 · answer #1 · answered by Sassy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not hardly. He has gotten a little carried away with himself, to the point that the rah-rah crowd is turning on him.
No one really wants another war, and every remembers the Iran/Iraq war.
2007-01-20 09:38:22 · answer #2 · answered by Steve H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iran's position of influence has increased in spite of US efforts so YES to your statement. Keep in mind that the real power in Iran is with the revolutionary council of mullahs and not this unshaven geek.
2007-01-20 09:10:34 · answer #3 · answered by Billy Dee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Would you like to try that question in English? There may be something interesting in there, but it's hard to tell. Also, if you are in the US, you're probably using what's called a QWERTY keyboard. Towards the upper left corner there's a letter Q that you might want to use in "Iraq."
2007-01-20 11:03:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You are correct. But it also make threat to the Iranian stronger . It is neutral.
2007-01-20 10:32:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No they wouldn't and it's "Ahmadinejad" and "Iraq" you idiot.
2007-01-20 09:11:12 · answer #6 · answered by rsryker38 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋